This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Oct. 26, 2026

Tech industry challenges California's social media warning label law

NetChoice argues that a new California law requiring social media platforms to display mental health warnings violates the First Amendment. Legal scholars question whether the mandated disclosures can withstand constitutional scrutiny.

A technology industry group has sued to block California's new social media warning label law before it takes effect in January, setting up another First Amendment battle over the state's efforts to regulate online platforms.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in the Central District of California, argues that AB 56 unconstitutionally compels social media companies to display government-prescribed warnings about the potential mental health effects of their services. NetChoice ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up