This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

Law Office Management

Sep. 8, 2012

Verdict upheld in recent Taser International case

Taser International did not have to warn of risk, court rules.

In a recent case (Rosa v. Taser Intl., Inc.), a court of appeal upheld a verdict for Taser International, holding that under the circumstances of the present litigation, the manufacturer did not have a duty to warn of risk that application of a stun gun to humans could cause fatal levels of metabolic acidosis. The court also held that the manufacturer's failure to test for risks related to acidosis before distribution of the product did not demonstrate a lack of exercise of due care. See the full text of the case here.

This lawsuit is one of many, like the one reported below in our December 2008 issue, brought against Taser International, the manufacturer of the ubiquitous Taser weapon deployed by law enforcement officials.
#272596

Riley Guerin

Daily Journal Staff Writer
rguerin@journaltech.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com