This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Aug. 31, 2017

CAALA Special: Class Delayed

Substantial suits set to shape class action, employment and consumer law jurisprudence await appellate rulings on threshold jurisdictional questions: Brian Kabateck (Kabateck Brown Kellner) and Chris Baker (Baker Curtis & Schwartz) discuss the NLRA-based argument against individual arbitration pending before the 9th Circuit and SCOTUS, and Jim Sturdevant (Sturdevant Law Firm) contends the California Supreme Court can decide when steep loan interest rates become illegal

Brian S. Kabateck

Founding and Managing Partner Kabateck LLP

Consumer rights

633 W. Fifth Street Suite 3200
Los Angeles , CA 90071

Phone: 213-217-5000

Email: bsk@kbklawyers.com

Brian represents plaintiffs in personal injury, mass torts litigation, class actions, insurance bad faith, insurance litigation and commercial contingency litigation. He is a former president of Consumer Attorneys of California.

Chris D. Baker

Partner Baker Curtis & Schwartz, P.C.

Email: cbaker@bakerlp.com

James C. Sturdevant

The Sturdevant Law Firm

Phone: (415) 477-2410

Email: jsturdevant@sturdevantlaw.com



On this special CAALA convention edition of the show, attorneys chat three pending cases that stand to profoundly shape the landscape of class action litigation, one the suit against Uber over its classifying drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, another the triumvirate of cases consolidated before SCOTUS that present the question of whether the NLRA scuttles independent arbitration clauses commonly found it most employment contracts today, and a third, before the Cal. Supreme Court, regarding whether courts may, under state lending law, step in to declare unconscionable certain consumer loans, here the type peddled to high-risk borrows and entailing steep interest rates.

Brian Kabateck (Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP), who represents the named plaintiff in the Uber misclassification suit, will discuss that matter, now awaiting argument before the 9th Circuit; Chris Baker (Baker, Curtis, & Schwartz PC) will chat about the consolidated cases Epic Systems v. Lewis, Ernst & Young v. Morris, and NLRB v. Murphy Oil, and Jim Sturdevant (Sturdevant Law Firm) will unpack De La Torre v. Cashcall.

#343056

Brian Cardile

Rulings Editor, Podcast Host, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reporter
brian_cardile@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com