This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Right to Vote v. Right to Purge

By Anderson Francois, Robert Popper Brian Cardile, Nicolas Sonnenburg | Jan. 19, 2018

U.S. Supreme Court,
Immigration,
Government,
Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Jan. 19, 2018

Right to Vote v. Right to Purge

As SCOTUS considers Ohio's program to notice and then purge inactive voters from the state's registry, opposing amici Robert Popper (Judicial Watch) and Aderson Francois (Georgetown Law) offer competing takes on whether Ohio's approach violates federal law. Plus, reporter Nick Sonnenburg explains how the Department of Justice hopes to leapfrog 9th Circuit review of the Northern District's DACA injunction.

Robert Popper

Senior Attorney, Judicial Watch Inc.

Email: rpopper@judicialwatch.org

Robert is director of Judicial Watch's Election Integrity Project.

Anderson Francois

Professor, Georgetown Law

Anderson is director of the Institute for Public Representation Civil Rights Law Clinic at Georgetown Law.



#345754

Brian Cardile

Rulings Editor, Podcast Host, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reporter
brian_cardile@dailyjournal.com

Nicolas Sonnenburg

Daily Journal Staff Writer
nicolas_sonnenburg@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com