This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

U.S. Supreme Court,
Constitutional Law

Apr. 13, 2018

Unqualified Immunity?

After another SCOTUS summary reversal of a Qualified Immunity denial, Jay Schweikert (Cato Institute) discusses what he sees as the doctrine's suspect legal grounding and the adverse policy implications of its increasingly pro forma application, and Professor James Pfander (Pritzker School of Law) describes how QI's application stagnates constitutional tort law doctrine, and how nominal damage claims could provide a solution.

Jay Schweikert

Policy Analyst Cato Institute

James Pfander

Professor Northwestern Pritzker School of Law



#347038

Brian Cardile

Rulings Editor, Podcast Host, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reporter
brian_cardile@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com