This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Labor/Employment,
Business Law

Nov. 4, 2024

Critical differences between exempt and non-exempt employees for small businesses

Knowing the difference between these classifications is not only a matter of compliance; it's fundamental to maintaining a fair and legally sound workplace.

Clifton W. Albright

Founding Partner and President
Albright, Yee & Schmit, APC

Email: info@ayslaw.com

Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA

Critical differences between exempt and non-exempt employees for small businesses
Shutterstock

Understanding the exempt vs. non-exempt employee distinction: essential knowledge for small businesses

For small business owners and HR managers, one of the most important yet challenging compliance tasks is correctly classifying employees as either exempt or non-exempt. While this may seem straightforward, errors in classification can result in costly fines, backpay liabilities, and even legal action. Knowing the difference between these classifications is not only a matter of compliance; it's fundamental to maintaining a fair and legally sound workplace.

What does "exempt" mean?

An "exempt" employee is generally someone who is excluded from certain wage and hour protections, particularly regarding overtime pay. Exempt employees are typically salaried and must meet specific criteria under federal (Fair Labor Standards Act, or FLSA) and California law. In California, employees in executive, administrative, or professional roles often qualify as exempt; however, they must meet both the duties and salary requirements. Heyen v. Safeway, Inc. (2013) clarified that merely overseeing other employees is not sufficient for exemption--managers must primarily engage in managerial tasks, demonstrating California's focus on job responsibilities over titles alone.

Non-exempt employee rights

Non-exempt employees, conversely, are entitled to additional protections, including:

Overtime pay: In California, this includes one and a half times the employee's regular pay rate for hours beyond eight in a day or 40 in a week, and double-time pay for shifts exceeding 12 hours in a day or eight hours on the seventh consecutive day.

Meal and rest breaks: Non-exempt employees are entitled to 10-minute paid rest breaks every four hours worked, as well as a 30-minute unpaid meal break if they work over five hours in a shift.

Cases like Martinez v. Joe's Crab Shack Holdings (2014) have reinforced California's overtime requirements, underscoring employers' obligations to comply strictly with these protections.

Why accurate classification matters

Exempt status is not determined by job title alone but by actual job responsibilities and compensation. Employers must ensure exempt employees perform qualifying duties and earn a minimum salary twice the state's minimum wage for full-time work. Misclassifying an employee can be costly. In Ramirez v. Yosemite Water Co., Inc. (1999), the court resolved any ambiguity in favor of non-exempt status, holding employers to a high standard for proving exempt classification. Similarly, United Parcel Service Wage & Hour Cases (2010) emphasized that classification must reflect actual duties, not job descriptions, underscoring the need for thorough and ongoing evaluation.

Avoiding misclassification risks

Compliance starts with accurate job descriptions that align with employees' actual responsibilities. Periodically reviewing classifications is especially critical for "borderline" roles where responsibilities may shift. Cases like Rodriguez v. Parivar, Inc. (2022) serve as a reminder of the importance of diligent review; the court held the employer liable for unpaid overtime due to insufficient review of job duties, emphasizing the financial risks of misclassification.

Final thoughts: protecting your business

The exempt vs. non-exempt distinction goes beyond mere technicality--it's crucial for ensuring compliance and protecting both employees' rights and business interests. For California businesses, maintaining updated classifications in accordance with evolving roles and labor laws is an investment in legal peace of mind.

Quick tip: As job roles evolve, so too should classifications. Periodically revisiting classifications and consulting an employment attorney as needed is a proactive approach that can save both time and money. After all, it's much cheaper to call a lawyer before there's an issue than after it's on your desk.

In the world of employment classifications, a little caution today can save substantial costs tomorrow.

#381627


Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com