Labor/Employment,
Business Law
Nov. 4, 2024
Critical differences between exempt and non-exempt employees for small businesses
Knowing the difference between these classifications is not only a matter of compliance; it's fundamental to maintaining a fair and legally sound workplace.





Clifton W. Albright
Founding Partner and President
Albright, Yee & Schmit, APC
Email: info@ayslaw.com
Loyola Law School; Los Angeles CA

Understanding
the exempt vs. non-exempt employee distinction: essential knowledge for small businesses
For small
business owners and HR managers, one of the most important yet challenging
compliance tasks is correctly classifying employees as either exempt or
non-exempt. While this may seem straightforward, errors in classification can
result in costly fines, backpay liabilities, and even legal action. Knowing the
difference between these classifications is not only a matter of compliance;
it's fundamental to maintaining a fair and legally sound workplace.
What does
"exempt" mean?
An
"exempt" employee is generally someone who is excluded from certain wage and
hour protections, particularly regarding overtime pay. Exempt employees are
typically salaried and must meet specific criteria under federal (Fair Labor
Standards Act, or FLSA) and California law. In California, employees in
executive, administrative, or professional roles often qualify as exempt;
however, they must meet both the duties and salary requirements. Heyen v.
Safeway, Inc. (2013) clarified that merely overseeing other employees is
not sufficient for exemption--managers must primarily engage in managerial
tasks, demonstrating California's focus on job responsibilities over titles
alone.
Non-exempt
employee rights
Non-exempt
employees, conversely, are entitled to additional protections, including:
Overtime
pay:
In California, this includes one and a half times the employee's regular pay
rate for hours beyond eight in a day or 40 in a week, and double-time pay for
shifts exceeding 12 hours in a day or eight hours on the seventh consecutive
day.
Meal
and rest breaks:
Non-exempt employees are entitled to 10-minute paid rest breaks every four
hours worked, as well as a 30-minute unpaid meal break if they work over five
hours in a shift.
Cases like
Martinez v. Joe's Crab Shack Holdings (2014) have reinforced
California's overtime requirements, underscoring employers' obligations to
comply strictly with these protections.
Why accurate
classification matters
Exempt
status is not determined by job title alone but by actual job responsibilities
and compensation. Employers must ensure exempt employees perform qualifying
duties and earn a minimum salary twice the state's minimum wage for full-time
work. Misclassifying an employee can be costly. In Ramirez v. Yosemite Water
Co., Inc. (1999), the court resolved any ambiguity in favor of non-exempt
status, holding employers to a high standard for proving exempt classification.
Similarly, United Parcel Service Wage & Hour Cases (2010) emphasized
that classification must reflect actual duties, not job descriptions,
underscoring the need for thorough and ongoing evaluation.
Avoiding
misclassification risks
Compliance
starts with accurate job descriptions that align with employees' actual
responsibilities. Periodically reviewing classifications is especially critical
for "borderline" roles where responsibilities may shift. Cases like Rodriguez
v. Parivar, Inc. (2022) serve as a reminder of the importance of diligent
review; the court held the employer liable for unpaid overtime due to
insufficient review of job duties, emphasizing the financial risks of
misclassification.
Final thoughts:
protecting your business
The exempt
vs. non-exempt distinction goes beyond mere technicality--it's crucial for
ensuring compliance and protecting both employees' rights and business
interests. For California businesses, maintaining updated classifications in
accordance with evolving roles and labor laws is an investment in legal peace
of mind.
Quick tip: As job roles evolve, so too
should classifications. Periodically revisiting classifications and consulting
an employment attorney as needed is a proactive approach that can save both
time and money. After all, it's much cheaper to call a lawyer before there's an
issue than after it's on your desk.
In the
world of employment classifications, a little caution today can save
substantial costs tomorrow.
Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com