Technology,
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Apr. 8, 2025
Mastering eDiscovery and AI in ADR: A guide for legal practitioners
As AI reshapes the legal landscape, mastering eDiscovery isn't just a career advantage for attorneys - it's now an ethical obligation they can't afford to ignore.





Daniel B. Garrie
Neutral
JAMS
Cyber Security
Orange County
Cell: (212) 826-5351
Email: daniel@lawandforensics.com

Bradford K. Newman
Partner
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Email: Bradford.Newman@bakermckenzie.com
Bradford Newman is the founder and co-chair of the AI and Blockchain Subcommittee of the ABA and leader of Baker McKenzie's AI practice. Recognized by the Daily Journal in 2019 as one of the Top 20 AI attorneys in California, Bradford has been instrumental in proposing federal AI workplace and IP legislation that in 2018 was turned into a United States House of Representatives Discussion Draft bill. In 2023, he was invited to testify before the United States Senate as an expert on AI and the Future of Work. He is frequently called upon to teach judges and lawyers AI CLE courses on a national level, has been an invited AI lecturer at the nation's top law and business schools, and has developed AI oversight and corporate governance best practices designed to ensure algorithmic fairness.

The landscape of pre-trial discovery is rapidly evolving as
eDiscovery and artificial intelligence (AI) continue to reshape legal practice.
As AI technology becomes increasingly integrated into legal frameworks, legal
practitioners who are early in their careers must understand how to navigate
these new frontiers, particularly in alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
settings. This is not an option, but rather, is part of licensed attorney's
duty of competence. For example, Comment
8 to the ABA Model Rule 1.1, "Duty of Competence," specifically provides:
"To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep
abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and
risks associated with relevant technology...."
Understanding eDiscovery: A necessity for modern legal practice
Electronic discovery, or eDiscovery, is the process of
identifying, collecting, and producing electronically stored information (ESI)
in litigation and other legal proceedings. The Sedona Conference Glossary:
E-Discovery & Digital Information Management (Fifth Edition), 21 Sedona
Conf. J. 263 (2020) (last visited: October 15, 2024). ESI encompasses a wide
variety of data sources, including emails, social media posts, documents,
databases, and more. Given the increasing reliance on digital communication and
documentation, eDiscovery has become a crucial element in modern legal
practice. Garrie,
Newman et al: Uncovering Digital Evidence: A Comprehensive Guide for Legal
Professionals in the Digital Era, Springer Nature Switzerland AG (2024),
Chapter 6: Digital Forensic Investigations and eDiscovery.
Balancing transparency and efficiency in dispute resolution
While ADR - such as arbitration and mediation - historically
involved fewer formal discovery requirements than traditional litigation, the
rise of eDiscovery has transformed this process. ADR parties often require the
same level of data transparency as in litigation, and eDiscovery plays a
pivotal role in facilitating that transparency. For example, in complex cases
involving intellectual property or corporate disputes, the discovery of
critical documents can make or break a resolution.
How artificial intelligence enhances legal efficiency
Understanding the unique demands of eDiscovery is essential for
legal practitioners handling ADR cases. While the informal nature of ADR might
suggest fewer procedural hurdles, that doesn't mean the data management
responsibilities are any lighter. Lawyers should be prepared to manage large
volumes of data efficiently and ethically. This includes familiarity with data
privacy laws, document review platforms, and advanced search techniques to
locate relevant ESI.
Furthermore, it's essential to anticipate potential disputes
surrounding the scope of discovery in ADR. The flexibility of ADR processes can
sometimes lead to disagreements about the extent of eDiscovery, including which
documents are relevant and how burdensome discovery requests might be. Legal
professionals must be skilled in negotiating these issues while effectively
advocating for their clients. Practitioners should ensure familiarity with JAMS
rules regarding eDiscovery. Arbitration Discovery Protocols, JAMS Mediation,
Arbitration and ADR Services (last visited: February 17, 2025).
Using AI-driven insights to improve case outcomes
AI is revolutionizing eDiscovery by automating the more tedious
aspects of document review and data analysis. Through AI-powered tools, lawyers
can now sift through vast amounts of ESI more quickly and accurately than ever
before. These tools use machine learning algorithms to categorize documents,
identify key themes, and highlight potentially relevant information for
attorneys. For a more detailed discussion, see Garrie, Newman et al: Uncovering
Digital Evidence: A Comprehensive Guide for Legal Professionals in the Digital
Era, Springer Nature Switzerland AG (2024), Chapter 6: beg Digital
Forensic Investigations and eDiscovery.
AI has also given rise to "predictive coding" or
Technology-Assisted Review (TAR). Predictive coding allows machines to learn
from human inputs, applying that knowledge to the broader dataset,
significantly reducing the time spent on manual review. Id. at p. 179
(explaining Predictive Coding) and p. 188 (explaining testing, scalability,
usability and accuracy); The
Sedona Conference, Commentary on Defense of Process: Principles and Guidelines
for Developing and Implementing a Sound E-Discovery Process, 15 Sedona Conf. J. 1, 55-56
(2014). (last visited: October 15, 2024). This not only increases efficiency
but also reduces costs, a significant advantage in ADR where parties often seek
expedited and cost-effective resolutions.
AI's impact on ADR
The role of AI in ADR extends beyond just eDiscovery. AI-powered
platforms are emerging as valuable tools in the actual dispute resolution
process, such as facilitating negotiations, predicting case outcomes, and
assisting in arbitration decisions. For example, some AI systems can analyze
historical case data to provide insights into likely outcomes based on similar
cases, helping lawyers and their clients make more informed decisions about
whether to settle or proceed.
Moreover, AI can assist mediators and arbitrators by
synthesizing complex data sets into digestible summaries, aiding their
decision-making process. For legal professionals, integrating AI into dispute
resolution will be key to maintaining a competitive edge. Artificial
Intelligence Clause, JAMS Mediation, Arbitration and ADR Services (last
visited: February 17, 2025).
Challenges and ethical considerations for legal practitioners'
data privacy and security
With the advent of eDiscovery and AI comes the need merely for
technical competency, but for heightened awareness around data privacy and
security. Handling sensitive information requires strict adherence to data
protection laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the
European Union and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) in the United
States. Mismanaging this data can lead to legal repercussions, especially in
cross-border ADR cases where data privacy rules differ significantly.
Legal Professionals must ensure that their eDiscovery processes
comply with relevant data privacy laws. They also need to consider the security
measures taken by their chosen eDiscovery platforms. Failing to protect
sensitive data could jeopardize not only the case but also the client
relationship and the lawyer's professional reputation.
Ethical and practical challenges in eDiscovery and AI
While AI offers many advantages, it also presents ethical
challenges. For example, predictive coding can inadvertently introduce biases
if the initial training set provided to the AI tool is skewed in some way. It
can also open up litigants to arguments of
"under-inclusivity" in data sets searched and weaknesses in selection criteria.
Lawyers must remain vigilant to ensure that AI outputs are not accepted without
critical oversight. It's important for legal professionals to understand the
limitations of AI and ensure that human judgment remains central to the dispute
resolution process.
Moreover, transparency in AI use is essential. ADR proceedings
thrive on trust, and parties (and often the specific arbitrator(s)) must be
informed when AI tools are used in their cases. Lawyers should be upfront about
how AI is deployed and ensure that the technology enhances, rather than
detracts from, the fairness of the process.
Key considerations for legal practitioners
1. Stay informed
The fields of eDiscovery and AI are constantly evolving. Legal
practitioners should actively seek out continuing legal education (CLE)
courses, attend webinars, and read industry publications to stay updated on the
latest developments. Organizations like the ABA and JAMS offer valuable
resources that can help new lawyers remain current on trends and best
practices.
2. Leverage technology
Familiarize yourself with key eDiscovery tools and platforms,
along with their capabilities and limitations. Whether you are working in a
large firm with dedicated eDiscovery teams or a smaller practice with limited
resources, understanding how these tools function will be beneficial. Learn the
basics of predictive coding, data preservation, and document review software,
and keep up with emerging AI platforms that promise to streamline the process.
3. Prioritize collaboration
Collaboration is key in both eDiscovery and ADR. Given the
technical nature of eDiscovery, legal practitioners should not hesitate to work
closely with IT professionals, forensic experts, and eDiscovery consultants. In
ADR, collaboration extends to working with opposing counsel to establish fair
and reasonable discovery parameters.
4. Focus on client communication
Clients may not always understand the intricacies of eDiscovery
or AI, but it's crucial to keep them informed. Simplify explanations and ensure
they understand the costs, benefits, and risks associated with these
technologies. Effective communication will help build trust and ensure that
clients feel comfortable with the strategies being employed on their behalf.
5. Develop negotiation skills
eDiscovery in ADR often involves negotiation. Lawyers must be
adept at discussing the scope and limitations of discovery with opposing
counsel. The goal should always be to achieve a fair balance between
transparency and efficiency, ensuring that neither side is overwhelmed by
excessive discovery demands.
Adapting to the digital transformation in ADR
For legal practitioners stepping into the world of ADR,
mastering the basics of eDiscovery and AI is more important than ever. These
technologies are transforming how legal disputes are managed and resolved,
offering exciting opportunities for those who can harness their potential. By
staying informed, leveraging technology: prioritizing collaboration, and
remaining mindful of ethical considerations, legal practitioners can navigate
these evolving frontiers with confidence.
Disclaimer:
The content is intended for general informational purposes only and should not
be construed as legal advice. If you require legal or professional advice,
please contact an attorney.
Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com