This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
News

California Supreme Court

Jan. 29, 2026

Chief justice says ICE activity, Racial Justice Act backlog and bar exam woes top court concerns

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said federal immigration authorities have appeared at at least 17 California courthouses in the past year, prompting courts to expand remote proceedings and seek guidance, while the Supreme Court prepares to address a growing backlog of Racial Justice Act appeals.

Chief justice says ICE activity, Racial Justice Act backlog and bar exam woes top court concerns
Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero. Photo courtesy of the California Supreme Court

Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said Thursday that federal immigration authorities have shown up at 17 state courthouses in California that she knows of in the past year, prompting her office to scramble to provide guidance to courts and how to react.

Courts have also expanded their remote proceedings in response, she said.

Speaking at an annual meeting with reporters who cover the state Supreme Court, Guerrero also addressed the massive backlog of Racial Justice Act cases facing the appellate courts. She said the high court is on the verge of issuing guidance to assist lower courts, while warning that new types of appeals under the law are likely to follow.

The Act, passed in the wake of George Floyd's killing by police in 2020, allows a criminal defendant to challenge a charge, conviction, or sentence by showing that race, ethnicity, or national origin played a role in the case. Crucially, the defendant does not have to prove intentional discrimination.

Finally, Guerrero addressed the "fiasco" of the February Bar Exam and reports the bar is still exploring adding a California-specific portion to the test. The bar will have one advantage going forward: new Executive Director Laura Enderton-Speed worked at the Judicial Council for 12 years and is well liked there.

The February 2025 California Bar Exam became a major controversy after a newly developed exam -- intended to replace the traditional national test and offered in a hybrid remote/inperson format -- was marred by widespread technical failures, logistical breakdowns and scoring issues.

The State Bar ultimately abandoned the new exam format and was ordered by the California Supreme Court to return to the traditional format for future administrations.

#389531

Malcolm Maclachlan

Daily Journal Staff Writer
malcolm_maclachlan@dailyjournal.com

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424

Send a letter to the editor:

Email: letters@dailyjournal.com