I read with interest State Sen. Thomas Umberg’s column on Senate Bill 17 aimed at mitigating gamesmanship in civil litigation....

Employers now have access to a great deal of information about applicants and employees from a wide variety of sources, but us...

What ethical obligations arise when an attorney is required to withdraw from representation because the client’s claim(s) lack...

For almost three years we have been witnessing the partisan reality show that is our president and Congress.

The U.S. Supreme Court was largely able to avoid controversy in the cases it decided last term, but when the justices return t...

California Supreme Court Justice Otto Kaus once prophetically said, “It seems to me that attorneys who handle policy claims ag...

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on the issue this week.

Recently, trial attorneys have begun to call me at the outset of a case, while it’s still in the trial court. “This case invol...

The state has a compelling interest in encouraging victims to report their abuse so that their assailants can be prosecuted fo...

As fully autonomous vehicles stuffed with Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) ready to take to our roadways and commandeer the live...

Bullies, butterflies, status quo and compliance

Due increasing lateral movement, it is more important than ever that firms take a close look at who they are hiring and how to...

Critical amendments in 1972 forever changed the protection of WOTUS. Simply put, it became unlawful for any person to discharg...

The courts have struggled with this topic for years, leading to uncertainty and allowing widely varying opinions from forensic...

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Inc., 18-1233, to resolve a circuit split regardi...

Politics aside, how far is a lawyer permitted ethically to go in assisting a client?

As set forth in Rule 1.0 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct, a primary purpose of rules governing attorney conduc...

Today, we pass the halfway point in our ongoing series of data-driven profiles of the justices of the California Supreme Court...

The increasing concerns of many Americans about the Chinese has been summed up by FBI Director Christopher Wray as a “whole of...

The Sept. 23 article on bail, “Critics unsure bail changes moving in right direction,” quotes Phil Telfeyan, executive directo...

The Trump administration’s waiver revocation is unwanted by anyone but President Trump (along with, perhaps, Big Oil, which al...

The State Bar’s proposals to authorize nonattorneys and for-profit corporations to practice law will upend the legal professio...

For the past 15 years, California employers have been plagued by mass actions brought under the Private Attorneys General Act,...

The issue before the Supreme Court is: Whether the phrase “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” in Section 145 encompasses t...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider appealability of timeliness determinations within inter partes review proceedings under 3...

Whether or not Assembly Bill 5 was really aimed only at the “gig economy,” its absurdly broad language will cause widespread a...

On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that will resolve a split in authority on standing to...

The Judicial Council has been misinforming the judiciary about the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act since t...

With thousands of children born each year using assisted insemination, in vitro fertilization, gestational carriers, many cour...

Impeachment isn’t the only trouble President Donald Trump is facing. Last Friday, three different federal judges rejected his ...