Ruling by
Victoria G. ChaneyLower Court
Los Angeles County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Mark A. BorensteinJudgment is not satisfied for purposes of postjudgment enforcement costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 685.080 until judgment creditor has been paid; thus, motion for postjudgment costs was timely.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In