| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
H031066
|
San Jose Construction Inc. v. S.B.C.C. Inc.
Triable issue exists to determine whether documents containing information compiled through time consuming process by employer and taken by former employee constitutes trade secret. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
G037365
|
Roden v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.
Court may interpret and review scope of prior judgment awarding retirement benefits to employee pursuant to employment contract, but may not calculate benefit amount. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
B192341
|
Jones & Matson v. Hall
Individual trustees are properly granted nonsuit where law firm fails to link conspiracy to terminate services with refusal to support political campaign. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
E040125
|
City of Riverside v. Stansbury
In case regarding ballot initiative measure, anti-SLAPP motion should not have been granted because city's lawsuit did not arise from protected activity. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
07-5847
|
Smith v. Arizona
Order |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | ||
|
06-1221
|
Sprint/United Mangement Co. v. Mendelsohn
Order |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | ||
|
06-1456
|
Cuellar v. United States
Order |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | ||
|
07-5976
|
Fields v. Florida
Order |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | ||
|
05-56026
|
Fantasyland Video Inc. v. County of San Diego
Regulations governing adult entertainment establishments are upheld. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
05-56047
|
Rhoades v. Avon Products Inc.
Case is improperly dismissed where plaintiff's claim that beauty product company threatened trademark infringement suit alleges true case or controversy. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
05-56319
|
Shane v. Albertson's Inc.
Improper delegation of discretionary authority prompts court's 'de novo' review of decision to terminate benefits under plan effective at time disability commenced. |
Employment Law |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
05-35541
|
SEC v. Ross
Third-party intervenor of right does not consent to personal jurisdiction by intervening. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
06-10401
|
U.S. v. Saeteurn
Trial court need not resolve factual dispute in presentence report that has no effect on temporal term of sentence imposed. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
05-16159
|
Carlson v. United States Postal Service
Contact information, business hours and final collection times of post offices are not exempt from FOIA disclosure. |
Government |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
D049020
|
People v. Stuedemann
Defendant is improperly convicted of rape by foreign object on unconscious person where victim was capable of resistance to conduct. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 15, 2007 | |
|
S148460
|
People v. Darling
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S144746
|
People v. German
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S133687
|
Shirk v. Vista Unified School District
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S155556
|
In re Phoenix H.
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S156045
|
Musaelian v. Adams
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S154847
|
People v. Nguyen
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | |
|
S155742
|
Sheehan v. San Francisco 49ers
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S155957
|
People v. Gurrola
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S155944
|
Goldstein v. Superior Court (Grand Jury)
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | |
|
S155322
|
Lopez v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
S115250
|
Gurule on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
04-56916
|
Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com
Order |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | ||
|
02-15866
|
Bockting v. Bayer
Hearsay statements of 'unavailable' six-year-old witness are admissible against stepfather accused of sexually assaulting her in motel bathroom. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | |
|
05-16847
|
Shimko v. Guenther
Limited partner is not liable for legal fees of partnership if his attorney failed to review partnership’s organic document and discover this fact. |
Corporations |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 | |
|
06-10377
|
U.S. v. Richard
District court erred when it permitted jury to rehear portion of witness' testimony against defendant without taking any additional precautions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Oct. 14, 2007 |