| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A170516
|
Myres v. Board of Admin. for CalPERS
Because CalPER's member's criminal conduct did not arise out of nor was in the performance of her official duties, pension forfeiture under Government Code section 7522.72(b)(1) was unsupported. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
M. Langhorne Wilson | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
B339866
|
Rinker v. Rinker
Trial court erroneously denied domestic violence restraining order, where husband provided ample evidence of wife's stalking and was not required to establish her intent to intimidate. |
Family Law |
|
A. Collins | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
24-4498
|
Milliken v. Bank of America, N.A.
Bank of America credit card agreement with variable rate did not violate the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act. |
Consumer Law |
|
D. Bress | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
24-3108
|
Khatibi v. Hawkins
Order |
|
Dec. 30, 2025 | ||
|
25-37
|
Wilkins v. U.S.
Because public use of government's easement over plaintiff private landowners' property provided objective notification, their Quiet Title Claim Act was time barred. |
Real Property |
|
M. Smith | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
25-286
|
InSinkErator, LLC v. Joneca Co., LLC
District court properly granted preliminary injunction for false advertising claim where garbage disposal horsepower labels likely influenced consumer purchasing decisions. |
Consumer Law |
|
S. Higginson | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
25-6625
|
Employees at the Clark County Government Center v. Monsanto Company
Because principal injuries from defendants' alleged nationwide toxic chemical sale and manufacture were not incurred in Nevada, Class Action Fairness Act local controversy exception was inapplicable. |
Civil Procedure |
|
E. Miller | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
25-886
|
Amazon.com Services LLC v. National Labor Relations Board
District court lacked jurisdiction to preliminarily enjoin NLRB proceedings, as the Norris-LaGuardia Act stripped it of power to issue injunctions in labor disputes. |
Labor Law |
|
D. Forrest | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
S257844
|
People v. Kopp
Ancillary costs waiver for indigent civil litigants, but not indigent criminal defendants, violated equal protection. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
C. Corrigan | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
B327347
|
Mendoza v. Board of Retirement of the Ventura County
Deputy Sheriff's unreasonable failure to mitigate damages--refusing necessary back surgeries--barred his entitlement to disability retirement benefits. |
Employment Law, Government |
|
K. Yegan | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
C102342
|
People v. Salstrom
On resentencing, Penal Code section 1465.9 required the trial court to vacate a restitution fine originally imposed more than ten years earlier. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
R. Robie | Dec. 30, 2025 |
|
E082051
|
Allen v. Patel
Trial court did not err by granting motion for a new trial due to attorney misconduct. |
Civil Procedure, Attorneys |
|
C. Codrington | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
A163504
|
Iloff v. LaPaille
Trial court should have imposed personally liability on officer of corporation that violated wage laws when plaintiff-employee elected to pursue such a remedy. |
Employment Law |
|
C. Smiley | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
A171588
|
In re J.L.
Because amended Welfare and Institutions Code section 730.6(b)(3) applies prospectively only, juvenile offenders were not entitled to retroactive apportionment of their restitution obligations. |
Juveniles |
|
M. Miller | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
B344654
|
In re K.G.
Expressly disagreeing with other Divisions' holdings, Division Eight of the Second Appellate District held Department of Family Services inquiry under ICWA adequate where some known extended family members were not contacted. |
Dependency |
|
J. Wiley | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
A170191
|
LaCour v. Marshalls of California
Denial of motion to compel arbitration was proper where parties' pre-*Viking River* PAGA waiver did not encompass mutual intent to "split" individual and non-individual PAGA claims. |
Arbitration |
|
J. Streeter | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
B336026
|
Ammari v. Ammari
Despite defendant's failure to answer amended complaint, default judgment was not appropriate where answer to the initial complaint denied allegations repeated, and necessary for claims asserted, in the amended complaint. |
Civil Procedure |
|
A. Tamzarian | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
25-4249
|
Thakur v. Trump
Amending_order |
|
Dec. 29, 2025 | ||
|
24-6338
|
Powers v. McDonough
District court did not abuse its discretion by ordering the Department of Veterans Affairs to construct permanent and temporary housing units for disabled veterans in its West Los Angeles campus. |
Veterans' Affairs |
|
A. De Alba | Dec. 29, 2025 |
|
24-4788
|
Industrial Park Center v. Great Northern Insurance Co.
Order |
|
Dec. 29, 2025 | ||
|
25A443
|
Trump v. Illinois
Order |
|
Dec. 29, 2025 | ||
|
A170737
|
Eng v. Opperman
Homeowner's association board was entitled to judicial deference, i.e., the "business judgment rule," in denying homeowners' request to build an accessory dwelling unit. |
Real Property |
|
J. Richman | Dec. 26, 2025 |
|
B329565
|
Fancourt v. Zargaryan
Trial court abused its discretion by allowing a tardily disclosed expert witness to testify at trial. |
Evidence |
|
J. Wiley | Dec. 26, 2025 |
|
A170983
|
Wise v. Tesla Motors, Inc.
Arbitration agreement was enforced where allegedly unconscionable terms were collateral to and severable from the agreement, and it did not secure an advantageous forum for the drafter. |
Arbitration |
|
D. Chou | Dec. 26, 2025 |
|
B324360
|
Towns v. Hyundai Motor America
Under Song-Beverly Act, only vehicle's buyer--not driver or responsible party--has standing to pursue a claim. |
Consumer Law, Civil Procedure |
|
H. Zukin | Dec. 26, 2025 |
|
22-10312; 23-1040; 23-1166; 23-1167
|
Amended Opinion: U.S. v. Holmes
Restitution for property lost as a result of company's fraud was the monetary value invested where there was no reasonable opportunity to sell shares after the fraud came to light. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
J. Nguyen | Dec. 26, 2025 |
|
G064218
|
Marriage of Patel
Family court acted within its authority in dismissing appellant's petition for legal separation under Family Code section 2345 when respondent's lack of consent made a judgment legally impossible. |
Family Law |
|
M. Sanchez | Dec. 23, 2025 |
|
C102783
|
Amaro v. Weber
Secretary of State improperly denied applications for restitution from corporate fraud fund as resubmissions without proper evidence and was required to properly evaluate them. |
Corporations |
|
S. Mesiwala | Dec. 23, 2025 |
|
A172510
|
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. Regents of University of California
Plaintiffs were not "successful parties" under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 where their temporary appellate victories were abrogated by legislation and reversed by the Supreme Court. |
Fees and Costs |
|
G. Burns | Dec. 23, 2025 |
|
A171351
|
Faiaipau v. THC-Orange County, LLC
Trial court erred by not ordering individual plaintiffs' wrongful death claim to arbitration, where death was allegedly caused by medical facility's disconnection of decedent's ventilator, not lack of custodial care. |
Arbitration |
|
T. Brown | Dec. 23, 2025 |