For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Craig
Criminal defendant had statutory right to appeal where superior court denied his unauthorized petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.1 on the merits rather than merely not responding. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/7 Jan. 20, 2026
Berkeley People's Alliance v. City of Berkeley
Order 		1DCA/4 Jan. 20, 2026
People v. Rodriguez
In denying defendant's Penal Code section 1172.6 resentencing request, trial court properly relied on preliminary hearing transcripts to frame defendant's theory of conviction despite transcript's possible inadmissibility. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence 2DCA/8 Jan. 20, 2026
Diamond Sands Apartments LLC v. Clark County Nevada
Fine imposed on property owner for tenants' continuing violations of county's short-term rental ordinances was not excessive for Eighth Amendment purposes. 		Constitutional Law 9th Jan. 20, 2026
City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon
Environmental Impact Report's water analysis for development project was sufficient for Environmental Quality Act purposes where it showed water was reasonably likely to be available from an identified source. 		Environmental Law, Water Rights 3DCA Jan. 16, 2026
The Merchant of Tennis v. Superior Court (Garcia)
Rescission laws required a curative notice to inform putative class members that rescinding their individual settlement agreements may obligate them to return settlement consideration if the employer ultimately prevailed. 		Remedies, Employment Law 4DCA/2 Jan. 16, 2026
Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)
LAPD nondisclosure order prohibiting Microsoft from notifying USC of the existence of warrant did not violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) or Microsoft's First Amendment rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 2DCA/4 Jan. 16, 2026
Modification: Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco
San Francisco's methods for calculating employee disability retirement benefits did not discriminate based on age of entry into the City's retirement system. 		Employment Discrimination 1DCA/4 Jan. 16, 2026
City of Gilroy v. Superior Court (Law Foundation of Silicon Valley)
California Public Records Act permits declaratory relief addressing past violations when such relief is likely to affect future public-records requests or agency conduct. 		Public Records Act CASC Jan. 16, 2026
People v. McCowan
California's firearm licensing scheme and Penal Code sections 25850, 30605, and 32310 are not facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment as interpreted in *Bruen*. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 1DCA/1 Jan. 15, 2026
People v. Washington
Parolee was still eligible for resentencing under section 1172.75 because he had been in custody serving a term that included a legally invalid enhancement when identified as eligible for relief. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Jan. 15, 2026
Modification: In re Thai
Limiting types of prison conduct credits available to advance youth parole eligibility date while allowing non-youthful offenders to utilize other types of credits did not violate equal protection. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 15, 2026
Tuufuli v. West Coast Dental Admin. Services
Regardless of whether the underlying employment relationship involved interstate commerce, trial court properly dismissed class claims where employment arbitration agreement expressly consented to Federal Arbitration Act governance. 		Arbitration 2DCA/8 Jan. 15, 2026
Barrett v. U.S.
Congress did not clearly authorize convictions under both sections 924(c)(1)(A)(i) and (j)(1) for a single act that violates both provisions; one act violating both sections may yield only one conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Case v. Montana
The test for an emergency aid warrantless entry into a home is whether officers have an objectively reasonable basis for believing that an occupant is seriously injured or imminently threatened with such injury. 		Constitutional Law USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Bost v. Illinois Bd. of Elections
Candidate for office had standing to challenge Illinois law requiring counting of mail-in ballots postmarked or certified by, but received after, election day. 		Civil Procedure USSC Jan. 15, 2026
Friends of Animals v. Burgum
Bureau of Land Management did not act improperly by approving contract for a new off-range corral to hold wild horses and burros in accordance with its standards. 		Animal Law, Environmental Law 9th Jan. 15, 2026
Modification: People v. Jimenez
Defendant was erroneously sentenced under the general vandalism statute, where a more specific, relevant statute concerning vandalism of jail property applied. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 5DCA Jan. 14, 2026
Howard v. Republican National Committee
Telephone Consumer Protection Act did not prohibit the sending of text messages containing a video file that required the user to press play to view the file. 		Consumer Law 9th Jan. 14, 2026
U.S. v. Gomez
Unpreserved claims on appeal are reviewed only for plain error and because district court's error classifying assault with a deadly weapon as a crime of violence was not plain, the sentence was affirmed. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Jan. 14, 2026
Malheur Forest Fairness Coal v. Iron Triangle, LLC
Plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead that defendant timber company had a monopoly in harvest rights and other related markets for contracts with the U.S. Forest Service. 		Antitrust 9th Jan. 14, 2026
Chong v. Mardirossian Akaragian LLP
Law firm was entitled to its full contingency fee where client voluntarily ratified an allegedly unauthorized settlement by subsequently agreeing to and accepting its benefits. 		Attorneys 2DCA/5 Jan. 12, 2026
State of Oregon v. Trump
Order 		9th Jan. 12, 2026
Barbanell v. Lodge
Because trial court's judgment granting the petition to appoint an arbitrator terminated a discrete action on the contract, respondents were entitled to attorneys' fees notwithstanding ongoing disputes elsewhere. 		Fees and Costs, Arbitration 4DCA/1 Jan. 12, 2026
Healy v. Milliman Inc.
To establish standing for unnamed class members at summary judgment, plaintiffs may rely on circumstantial evidence and need only show a triable issue of fact, not definitive proof of injury. 		Civil Procedure, Consumer Law 9th Jan. 12, 2026
Bowe v. U.S.
28 U.S.C. section 2244 does not bar certiorari petitions by federal prisoners, nor require that previously presented claims be dismissed. 		Habeas Corpus, Criminal Law and Procedure USSC Jan. 12, 2026
In re Gilsvik
Bankruptcy court's decision to reduce debtor's attorney's fees by over $3,000 was not clearly erroneous based on the services rendered and the minimal complexity of the case. 		Fees and Costs, Bankruptcy BAP Jan. 13, 2026
AliveCor, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Apple's refusal to share data from older algorithm after it was replaced with a newer, improved version did not constitute unlawful monopolization. 		Antitrust 9th Jan. 9, 2026
People v. Cagle
Defendant's due process claim was forfeited when he failed to raise concerns regarding expert opinions' reliability during trial. 		Evidence, Constitutional Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 9, 2026
Gonzalez v. City of Phoenix
Officers who used force that was counter to their training and continued the force after suspect was restrained, which resulted in death, were not entitled to qualified immunity. 		Qualified Immunity 9th Jan. 9, 2026
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.