For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Cox v. Gritman Medical Center
Idaho physician on Idaho/Washington border was subject to personal jurisdiction in Washington by electronically transmitting prescriptions from Idaho to Washington, which required compliance with Washington law. 		Civil Procedure 9th Feb. 12, 2026
The GEO Group v. Inslee
Order 		9th Feb. 12, 2026
People v. Diaz
Trial court was not required to consider criminal defendant's youth during resentencing proceedings where it determined she was a direct aider and abettor who acted with intent to kill. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Feb. 12, 2026
People v. Flores
Probation condition permitting warrantless searches of drug-possession-for-sale defendant's electronic devices and requiring disclosure of passwords was not overbroad. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 1DCA/2 Feb. 12, 2026
In re Reyna R.
Juvenile court erred in ordering father to pay for a professional visitation monitor without first evaluating his ability to pay and reasonable alternatives for monitored visitation. 		Dependency 2DCA/8 Feb. 11, 2026
In re J.C.
Because brandishing an imitation firearm under Penal Code section 417.4 does not trigger section 29820's firearm prohibition, juvenile court exceeded its authority in banning juvenile from owning firearms until age 30. 		Juveniles 1DCA/3 Feb. 11, 2026
People v. Zapata
Known law enforcement officer's continuing pressure for custodial undercover operation into suspect who had invoked his Miranda rights amounted to a custodial interrogation and rendered incriminating statements inadmissible. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 11, 2026
Zenith Insurance Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Bd.
Equitable tolling did not apply to extend the Worker's Compensation Appeals Board's statutory deadline under former Labor Code section 5909 to act on petition for reconsideration. 		Workers' Compensation, Civil Procedure 6DCA Feb. 11, 2026
Grant v. Chapman Univ.
Students' general expectations that classes would be largely in-person did not furnish a basis for contract claims against university that had ceased in-person instruction during COVID-19. 		Education, Contracts 4DCA/3 Feb. 10, 2026
Marriage of Allen
Even after the child reaches the age of majority, parents may not contractually waive accrued child support arrearages. 		Family Law 2DCA/6 Feb. 10, 2026
Semaan v. Mosier
Court-appointed received was protected by quasi-judicial immunity for the receiver's discretionary acts and decisions, so plaintiffs could not demonstrate minimal merit needed for claims to survive anti-SLAPP motion to strike. 		Anti-SLAPP, Immunity 4DCA/3 Feb. 10, 2026
Esparza v. Superior Court (People)
Under Evidence Code section 701, trial courts may not presume a witness is incompetent to testify based solely on a prior Lanterman-Petris-Short Act grave-disability finding. 		Evidence 4DCA/2 Feb. 9, 2026
Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc.
Collection and use of license plate information without publishing statutorily required privacy policy regarding such collection and use constituted harm sufficient to sue under the statute. 		Consumer Law 1DCA/5 Feb. 9, 2026
Conservatorship of A.B.
Where substantial evidence supported that conservatee--even on medication--lacked basic insight that he could not presently care for his basic needs without medication, renewal of conservatorship was affirmed. 		Conservatorship 1DCA/2 Feb. 6, 2026
Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis v. Funko Inc.
Funko's purportedly "forward-looking" statements about potential excess inventory risks were not entitled to PSLRA safe-harbor, where they implied that Funko was not already experiencing those risks. 		Securities 9th Feb. 6, 2026
U.S. v. Engstrom
Because defendant failed to provide a complete debrief to the government as required for safety-valve relief, district court erred in imposing a sentence below the statutory minimum. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Feb. 6, 2026
Montejo-Gonzalez v. Bondi
Applying categorical rule regarding traffic-caused lateness rather than considering the totality of the circumstances when deciding whether to reopen in-absentia removal order was an abuse of discretion. 		Immigration 9th Feb. 6, 2026
Higginson v. Kia Motors America
New trial was required where defendant's discovery misuse constituted an irregularity in the proceedings that prevented plaintiff from having a fair trial. 		Civil Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 5, 2026
Harris v. Muhammad
District court erroneously denied preliminary injunction for prisoner who sought a diet consistent with his religious beliefs. 		Constitutional Law, Prisoners' Rights 9th Feb. 5, 2026
Parsonage v. Wal-Mart Associates
Plain language of Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act grants consumers standing to recover statutory damages as remedy for violations of their statutory rights without any further showing of injury. 		Consumer Law 4DCA/1 Feb. 5, 2026
People v. Gomez
No Racial Justice Act violation where prosecutor's "John the dog" analogy to demonstrate circumstantial evidence was innocuous. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 5, 2026
People v. Heaps
Judicial assistant's ex parte response to note from deliberating jurors violated criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment rights because there was no evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of prejudice. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/1 Feb. 4, 2026
Navellier v. Putnam
Parties were admonished and warned of sanctions after failing to follow local court rules pertaining to notifying the court of a bankruptcy that could affect the case. 		Civil Procedure, Bankruptcy 1DCA/5 Feb. 4, 2026
The Committee for Tiburon LLC v. Town of Tiburon
Program Environmental Impact Report for local agency's general plan did not require site-specific environmental analysis of a site identified in its housing element, where no housing project had been proposed. 		Environmental Law 1DCA/3 Feb. 4, 2026
Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Moylan
Order 		9th Feb. 4, 2026
Brown v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Driver's license holder's procedural due process rights were not violated by Department of Motor Vehicle's refusal to disclose identity of third-party reporter who requested reevaluation of licensee's ability to drive. 		Administrative Agencies, Constitutional Law 3DCA Feb. 3, 2026
Modification: Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)
LAPD nondisclosure order prohibiting Microsoft from notifying USC of the existence of warrant did not violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) or Microsoft's First Amendment rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 2DCA/4 Feb. 3, 2026
Modification: Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. Eisenberg
Trial court properly granted preliminary injunction on water district's conversion claim, requiring a director to return a confidential report to the district. 		Torts 6DCA Feb. 3, 2026
Fuentes v. Empire Nissan
Although illegible terms in an arbitration agreement contributed to a high degree of procedural unconscionability, they were not automatically indicative of substantive unconscionability that would render the agreement unenforceable. 		Arbitration, Contracts CASC Feb. 3, 2026
Modification: People v. Aguilar
Trial court's failure to investigate potential juror's confusion invalidated peremptory challenge to strike that juror when there was a possibility that challenge was race-related. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/1 Feb. 2, 2026
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.