For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Modification: Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles
Requiring complainants to read and sign advisory notice that filing a knowingly false complaint of police misconduct was a crime placed an unconstitutional burden on speech. 		Constitutional Law CASC Jan. 26, 2026
Beeler v. Broomfield
District court properly denied death-row petitioner's habeas petition, where California Supreme Court could have reasonably concluded the evidence did not sufficiently support his incompetency claims. 		Habeas Corpus 9th Jan. 26, 2026
Yeh v. Barrington Pacific
Plaintiffs did not need to demonstrate any actual harm for standing to sue under statutory scheme (ICRAA) that established minimum statutory damages aimed at motivating compliance and enforcement. 		Consumer Law 2DCA/3 Jan. 23, 2026
Mustaqeem v. City of San Diego
By failing to recognize that a city's impoundment ordinance facially conflicted with state sidewalk vending law, trial court erred in denying sidewalk vendor's request for a preliminary injunction. 		Municipal Law 4DCA/1 Jan. 23, 2026
People v. Grandberry
Trial court did not err in declining to dismiss defendant's prior strikes because Penal Code section 1385(c) applies to enhancements, not prior strikes. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/6 Jan. 23, 2026
Marriage of Starr
Trial court erred in treating amended petition's separation date as a binding judicial admission when opposing party's actions supported it was still a contested issue. 		Civil Procedure, Family Law 1DCA/4 Jan. 23, 2026
N.D. v. Superior Court (E.F.)
Attorney's unreasonable violations of the Rules of Court and filing of a frivolous writ petition warranted the imposition of $25,000 in sanctions. 		Attorneys 4DCA/3 Jan. 22, 2026
In re Bella L.
Given the breadth of inquiry with other family members regarding possible Native American ancestry, agency's failure to question paternal grandfather did not render inquiry inadequate under Indian Child Welfare Act. 		Dependency, Native American Affairs 2DCA/5 Jan. 22, 2026
Barrios v. Chraghchian
Statute requiring plaintiffs in derivative suits to post a bond early in litigation did not block a prevailing defendant in derivative action from recovering costs under other rules and statutes. 		Business Law 2DCA/8 Jan. 22, 2026
R.R. v. C.R.
Trial court abused its discretion in denying ex-husband a domestic violence restraining order based on an erroneous understanding of what constitutes "abuse" under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. 		Family Law 2DCA/4 Jan. 22, 2026
Harmon v. Superior Court (People)
Public defender representation for postconviction habeas proceedings is discretionary under Government Code section 27706(g). 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jan. 22, 2026
Californians for Homeownership v. City of La Habra
No additional public hearings were required to approve city's housing element plan when changes were part of the same revision process rather than a new amendment. 		Municipal Law, Real Property 4DCA/3 Jan. 21, 2026
Randolph v. Trustees of the California State University
Civil defendant's failure to object to trial date beyond statutory period for bringing action to trial was not an agreement to extend the deadline, necessitating dismissal once the period expired. 		Civil Procedure 3DCA Jan. 21, 2026
People v. Superior Court (Lashelle)
Prosecutor's failure to file a formal misdemeanor complaint within 25 days of defendant's DUI citation did not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Jan. 21, 2026
Hu v. XPO Logistics, LLC
Property broker owed no duty to carrier's injured employee because the broker was not a licensed carrier and did not exercise control over the carrier's transport of the cargo. 		Torts 2DCA/5 Jan. 21, 2026
Modification: Towns v. Hyundai Motor America
Under Song-Beverly Act, only vehicle's buyer--not driver or responsible party--has standing to pursue a claim. 		Consumer Law, Civil Procedure 2DCA/4 Jan. 21, 2026
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
Requirement that motions to vacate judgments under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure be filed in a reasonable time applies to motions alleging the judgment is void. 		Civil Procedure USSC Jan. 21, 2026
Ellingburg v. U.S.
Because restitution imposed under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act constitutes criminal punishment, its retroactive application to offenses committed before its enactment violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law USSC Jan. 21, 2026
Berk v. Choy
When state's affidavit-of-merit requirement for medical malpractice actions conflicted with federal rules regulating the same civil procedure, federal rules prevailed. 		Civil Procedure USSC Jan. 21, 2026
Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana
Order 		USSC Jan. 21, 2026
Guevara-Serrano v. Bondi
Board of Immigration Appeals erred in finding that asylum petitioner's failure to report beatings to the Honduran government precluded relief, where reporting would have been futile and dangerous. 		Immigration 9th Jan. 21, 2026
In re: Akhlaghpour
Bankruptcy court's order granting leave to sue was not a modification of state court decision arising from an improperly filed state court action, so the *Rooker-Feldman* doctrine did not apply. 		Bankruptcy, Civil Procedure 9th Jan. 21, 2026
People v. Craig
Criminal defendant had statutory right to appeal where superior court denied his unauthorized petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.1 on the merits rather than merely not responding. 		Criminal Law and Procedure 2DCA/7 Jan. 20, 2026
Berkeley People's Alliance v. City of Berkeley
Order 		1DCA/4 Jan. 20, 2026
People v. Rodriguez
In denying defendant's Penal Code section 1172.6 resentencing request, trial court properly relied on preliminary hearing transcripts to frame defendant's theory of conviction despite transcript's possible inadmissibility. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Evidence 2DCA/8 Jan. 20, 2026
Diamond Sands Apartments LLC v. Clark County Nevada
Fine imposed on property owner for tenants' continuing violations of county's short-term rental ordinances was not excessive for Eighth Amendment purposes. 		Constitutional Law 9th Jan. 20, 2026
City of Vallejo v. City of American Canyon
Environmental Impact Report's water analysis for development project was sufficient for Environmental Quality Act purposes where it showed water was reasonably likely to be available from an identified source. 		Environmental Law, Water Rights 3DCA Jan. 16, 2026
The Merchant of Tennis v. Superior Court (Garcia)
Rescission laws required a curative notice to inform putative class members that rescinding their individual settlement agreements may obligate them to return settlement consideration if the employer ultimately prevailed. 		Remedies, Employment Law 4DCA/2 Jan. 16, 2026
Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles)
LAPD nondisclosure order prohibiting Microsoft from notifying USC of the existence of warrant did not violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (CalECPA) or Microsoft's First Amendment rights. 		Criminal Law and Procedure, Constitutional Law 2DCA/4 Jan. 16, 2026
Modification: Carroll v. City and County of San Francisco
San Francisco's methods for calculating employee disability retirement benefits did not discriminate based on age of entry into the City's retirement system. 		Employment Discrimination 1DCA/4 Jan. 16, 2026
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.