| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
B185956
|
Colburn v. The Northern Trust Co.
Creditor claims that would allow former wife and children to benefit from both testator's trust and dissolution judgment violate no-contest clause. |
Probate and Trusts |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
F051144
|
Jessica C., a Minor
Juvenile court must consider providing maintenance services to help ill grandfather before terminating guardianship and placing grandchildren in foster care. |
Juveniles |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
06-75539
|
In re: Freeman
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-10255
|
Bocanegra v. California
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-989
|
Hall Street Asoc. v. Mattel Inc.
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-1164
|
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-1287
|
CSX Transportation Inc. v. GA State Bd. of Equalization
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-9130
|
Ali v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-1081
|
Washington v. Vandelft
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
04-35797
|
Freeman v. Gonzales
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-1164
|
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-1287
|
CSX Transportation Inc. v. GA State Bd. of Equalization
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
06-9130
|
Ali v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
04-35797
|
Freeman v. Gonzales
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
S151745
|
Ciraulo v. City of Newport Beach
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
B191272
|
Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California
Insurance company's demurrer is improperly sustained where it had duty to defend. |
Insurance |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
B190062
|
DePalma v. Rodriguez
Court properly admits biomechanic's expert testimony that he would not expect force of motor vehicle accident to result in plaintiff's injuries. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
G036583
|
Melican v. Regents of the University of California
University does not have same funeral-related duties imposed on mortuaries to return unmingled 'cremains' of body willed to science. |
Torts |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
B191267
|
Franklin v. The Monanock Co.
Public policy dictates that, plaintiff's allegations concerning employer's inaction to threats by coworker, are sufficient to state claim for wrongful termination. |
Torts |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
S134545
|
Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. S.C. (Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Diego
Order |
|
May 29, 2007 | ||
|
C052673
|
O'Dea v. Bunnell
Prison officials who orchestrated rival gang fight did not violate injured correctional officer's right to due process. |
Civil Rights |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
D049027
|
Mary G., A Minor
Father's parental rights are improperly terminated where full faith and credit applies to Michigan paternity affidavit. |
Family Law |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
B197193
|
In re Gray
Petitioner's due process rights violated where governor's reversal of parole recommendation not supported by 'some evidence' that second degree murder was 'especially heinous.' |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
C050683
|
People v. Gunder
Admission of videotape and transcript of witness's pre-trial interview does not violate right to confrontation where witness claims complete memory loss. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
B187666
|
LT-WR LLC v. California Coastal Commission
Commission violates owner's right to exclude public by denying permit to maintain gates and no trespassing signs based on 'potential' prescriptive rights. |
Real Property |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
A115702
|
Dina V., a Minor
$4,419.72 restitution, based on repair costs, is properly ordered against minor alleged to have taken vehicle without owner's permission. |
Juveniles |
|
May 29, 2007 | |
|
06-10255
|
Bocanegra v. California
Order |
|
May 28, 2007 | ||
|
06-989
|
Hall Street Asoc. v. Mattel Inc.
Order |
|
May 28, 2007 | ||
|
06-1081
|
Washington v. Vandelft
Order |
|
May 28, 2007 | ||
|
B188707
|
Carpenter v. Jack in the Box Corp.
Motion for attorney fees does not commence to run upon entry of prejudgment appealable order denying special motion to strike. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 28, 2007 |