| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
05-1272
|
Rockwell International Corp. v. United States
Qui tam relator must have direct and independent knowledge of information on which allegations are based in order to establish jurisdiction over claims. |
Government |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
03-50524
|
U.S. v. Howard
District-wide policy of requiring pretrial detainees to wear leg shackles at their first appearance before magistrate judge does not violate due process. |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
05-35459
|
Siaperas v. Montana State Compensation Insurance Fund
Where injured employee challenged reduction of her benefits, insurance company's motion to dismiss is properly granted. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
06-55537
|
Goldstein v. City of Long Beach
District attorney is not immune from suit where he allegedly failed to ensure that information regarding jailhouse informants is shared among prosecutors. |
Government |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
C052286
|
Myers v. Trendwest Resorts Inc.
Employer is not entitled to summary judgment on sexual harassment claims where supervisor's behavior and scope of employment are triable issues of fact. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
C052159
|
Jordan v. City of Sacramento
If attorney belatedly files suit in reliance on municipality's misstatement of accessible law, city is not estopped from asserting statute of limitations defense. |
Government |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
F051032
|
S.W., a Minor
Juvenile court has subject matter jurisdiction to terminate parental rights where evidence shows mother and children were living in California. |
Family Law |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
B190103
|
Stewart v. Seward
Creditor's claim against estate does not toll statute of limitations for claim based on decedent's failure to effect promised distribution of his estate. |
Probate and Trusts |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
S150316
|
James F., a Minor
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150444
|
People v. Adams
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150333
|
People v. Ray
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149371
|
People v. Brandon
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149304
|
People v. Isom
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149528
|
People v. Roberts
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150408
|
People v. Rubalcaba
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149468
|
People v. Salazar
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150293
|
People v. Salinas
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150418
|
People v. Speakes
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149401
|
Fudil v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150318
|
Levine v. Superior Court (Bashforth)
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S149626
|
Zembsch v. Superior Court (Health Net of California)
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
H030068
|
Lezama-Carino v. Miller
Appeal from custody order is timely filed where father established he submitted notice of appeal to court on date it was due. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
H029903
|
Estate of Drummond
Prevailing party determination for purposes of fee award may not be based on interim procedural victory, but only final resolution of contract claims. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
S148500
|
Roland on Discipline
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S121159
|
People v. Rabaduex
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
S150242
|
Sierra Bible Church v. WCAB
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
05-296
|
Gomez v. Tennessee
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | ||
|
04-16387
|
Af-Cap Inc. v. Chevron Overseas (Congo) Limited
Dismissal of garnishment action is proper where obligations identified by plaintiff are not property of defendant used for commercial activity. |
Business Law |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
05-75269
|
Safe Air For Everyone v. United States EPA
EPA's conclusion that field burning is permissible is legally erroneous if plain language of state's Clean Air Act implementation plan prohibits field burning. |
Environmental Law |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 | |
|
06-30161
|
U.S. v. Perez
District court erred by conducting limited 'Ameline' remand of defendant's sentence where such remand had been ruled out by appellate court. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 29, 2007 |