| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
F047476
|
People v. Flores
Despite sexually violent predator's decision to undergo castration, jury's finding of future dangerousness was supported by substantial evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
C052035
|
Shannon T., a Minor
Juvenile court's finding that minor committed sexual battery is proper where evidence shows he acted with requisite purpose. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
F048799
|
People v. Mutuma
Determination whether predicate offenses involve 'safe operation of motor vehicle upon highway' is question of law for judge, not jury. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
F050003
|
D.D., a Minor
Where court did not appoint guardian ad litem for minor father, termination of reunification services is not proper. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
G035739
|
Credit Managers Association of California v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc.
Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Section 547, does not pre-empt Code of Civil Procedure Section 1800 regarding recovery of preferences. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
B185846
|
County of Los Angeles v. Harco National Insurance Co.
In bail forfeiture case, surety who failed to file timely notice of appeal was not entitled to collaterally attack judgment. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
S131484
|
Muzzy Ranch v. Solano County Airport Land Use Commn.
Order |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | ||
|
S132814
|
Oakland Raiders v. National Football League
Order |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | ||
|
05-85
|
Powerex Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, et al.
Order |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | ||
|
S143287
|
Hernandez v. City of Hanford
Order |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | ||
|
G033868
|
Cohen v. Health Net of California Inc.
ERISA preempts employee's claims against health care provider. |
Employment Law |
|
Mar. 21, 2007 | |
|
S141502
|
Gentry v. S.C. (Circuit City Stores)
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S150001
|
Johnson v. Miller
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S140247
|
People v. Yang
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
A110449
|
In re Marriage Cases
Family Code sections limiting availability of civil marriage to opposite sex couples is not unconstitutional. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | |
|
S149348
|
People v. Castillo
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149379
|
People v. Herrell
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S150129
|
People v. Shchirskiy
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149595
|
People v. Bacon
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149804
|
People v. Beswetherick
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S150057
|
People v. Corona
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149332
|
People v. Dunn
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149837
|
People v. Doung
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149966
|
People v. Lara
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S150041
|
People v. Mandarino
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149564
|
People v. Pack
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149964
|
People v. Ramirez
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149223
|
People v. Verduzco
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S150121
|
People v. Waller
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 | ||
|
S149539
|
People v. Martin
Order |
|
Mar. 20, 2007 |