For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Wright
Medical Marijuana Program applied retroactively to entitle defendant to compassionate use instruction on transportation count. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 21, 2006
Browning-Ferris Industries v. W.C.A.B.
Order 		Dec. 21, 2006
People v. Wright
Order 		Dec. 21, 2006
City of Santa Barbara v. S.C. (Janeway)
Order 		Dec. 21, 2006
Medill v. Westport Insurance Corporation
Order 		Dec. 21, 2006
Hodge v. Poway Unified School District
Order 		Dec. 21, 2006
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior Court (Fair Political Practices Comm'n.
Indian tribe may not claim tribal immunity to avoid complying with reporting requirements contained in Political Reform Act. 		Administrative Agencies Dec. 21, 2006
City of Goleta v. Superior Court (Oly Chadmar Sandpiper General Partnership)
Subdivision Map Act exception to rule making approval of final subdivision map ministerial is effective without adoption by newly incorporated city. 		Real Property Dec. 21, 2006
In re Miller
Board of Parole Hearings was not entitled to rely on unsworn hearsay statements in revoking parole. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Wakefield v. Bohlin
Plaintiff qualifying as prevailing party under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1032 was entitled to award of costs as matter of right. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Matera v. McLeod
Where trial court vacated ruling upon reconsideration and effectively reinstated judgment, time to appeal judgment began to run when judgment was reinstated. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
E.L. Yeager Construction v. WCAB
Independent medical examiner's opinion on apportionment is improperly rejected under newly enacted statutes. 		Workers' Compensation Dec. 20, 2006
In re Burton
Habeas corpus petitioner fails to meet his burden of proving that counsel disregarded clearly expressed desire to present guilt phase defense. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
People v. Brandon
Separate consecutive sentences for pimping and procurement of child or pandering is not improper punishment of same act under separate provisions of law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Wachovia Bank v. Lifetime Industries Inc.
Defendant's lien is not extinguished where exercise of option to purchase did not give plaintiff title to remainder interest. 		Real Property Dec. 20, 2006
Breen v. City of San Diego
Order 		Dec. 20, 2006
Hearst v. Ganzi
Proposed petition against trustees for breach of fiduciary duty violates no contest clause of will. 		Probate and Trusts Dec. 20, 2006
Pellerin v. Kern County Employees' Retirement Association
Where fireman suffered from heart condition, county employees' retirement association must find statutory industrial-causation element present. 		Government Dec. 20, 2006
Levine v. Smith
Court properly set aside default judgment as void because it was greater than amount demanded in first amended complaint. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Stroup v. Wilcox
Order 		Dec. 20, 2006
Lozada v. City and County of San Francisco
Officer's cause of action against city is barred for failure to file claim to public entity employer under Government Claims Act. 		Government Dec. 20, 2006
People v. Conrad
In case where prosecutorial delay caused loss of testimony, dismissal was improper where prejudice could have been substantially mitigated. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
People v. Smart
Where defendants were convicted of only one qualifying crime, one of two sentencing enhancements against each must be stricken. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. City of American Canyon (Lake Street Ventures LLC)
Where proposed changes to development project created significant environmental effects, supplemental environmental review was necessary. 		Environmental Law Dec. 20, 2006
Britts v. Superior Court (Berg & Berg Enterprises)
All discovery motions, including those pending when special motion to strike is filed, are 'discovery proceedings' for purposes of anti-SLAPP statute. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Sony Electronics Inc. v. Superior Court (Hapner)
Class membership based on ultimate issue of liability is not ascertainable because class definition must be based on objective criteria. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Boonyarit v. Payless Shoesource Inc.
Defendant who is voluntarily dismissed from complaint must secure entry of order or judgment of dismissal to be prevailing party and recover costs. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
Bakersfield Elementary Teachers Association v. Bakersfield City School District
School district's policy of classifying teachers and counselors as temporary employees based only on certification is invalid. 		Education Dec. 20, 2006
Parra v. City and County of San Francisco
One-year limitation for disciplinary proceedings provided by Public Safety Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act may be tolled or extended in certain circumstances. 		Government Dec. 20, 2006
People v. Segura
Trial court had continuing authority to modify terms and conditions of probation, even over prosecutor's objection and despite plea agreement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.