For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Maharaj v. Gonzales
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
U.S. v. Bhagat
No constructive amendment or material variance of indictment is found where facts presented were introduced for impeachment purposes. 		Securities Oct. 18, 2006
Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. City of Seattle
City regulation allowing it to oversee hazardous liquid pipeline within its boundaries was pre-empted by Pipeline Safety Improvement Act. 		Government Oct. 18, 2006
Watson v. Weeks
Private right of action exists under Medicaid Act provision phrased in terms of individuals benefited. 		Government Oct. 18, 2006
Smith v. Mitchell
Evidence did not support conviction of grandmother for death of grandson under prosecution's theory of Shaken Baby Syndrome. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 18, 2006
Dunkle v. California
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Laboratory Corp, of america v. Metabolite Laboratories, et al.
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Lentz v. United States
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Vazquez-Valentin v. Santiago-Diaz
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Andrade v. Gonzales, Att'y. Gen.
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Washington v. Recuenco
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Prete v. Bradbury
Party failed to demonstrate that Oregon ballot measure's prohibition of payment to petition signature gatherers unconstitutionally burdened political speech. 		Constitutional Law Oct. 18, 2006
Universal Banner Network v. Zell
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Mosley v. San Bernardino City Unified School District
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Odom v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Putman v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Perryman v. S.C. (People)
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Ramos (Humberto) on H.C.
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Pilimai v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Concannon v. Imperial Capital Bank (In re Concannon)
Bankruptcy Code Section 506(d) could not be used by Chapter 7 debtor to strip off wholly unsecured noncensual lien. 		Bankruptcy Oct. 18, 2006
Ornaski v. Belmontes
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Ornaski v. Belmontes
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Lafreniere v. Trustees of CA State Univ.
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Texas v. Penry
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Lingle, Gov. of HI v. Arakaki
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Friemann v. United States
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Smith v. United States
Order 		Oct. 18, 2006
Sprint Telephony PCS v. County of San Diego
County's wireless telecommunications ordinance is valid, as local municipalities are not barred from regulating installation of equipment in public right of way. 		Government Oct. 18, 2006
LeMere v. Slaughter
District court properly concluded that it should evaluate sufficiency of evidence against defendant based on all evidence presented in case. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Oct. 18, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.