For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Estate of Sauressig
Witness to execution of will can fulfill signature requirement after testator's death. 		Probate and Trusts Jun. 21, 2006
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. S.C. (Ryan)
Order 		Jun. 21, 2006
People v. Ryan
Order 		Jun. 21, 2006
In re Michael V.
Order 		Jun. 21, 2006
Garrett (Craig) on H.C.
Order 		Jun. 21, 2006
People v. San Nicolas
Order 		Jun. 21, 2006
Hicks v. Superior Court (Kaufman & Broad Home Corp.)
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
City of Stockton v. S.C. (Civic Partners Stockton, LLC)
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Ordlock v. Franchise Tax Board
Taxpayers need not report IRS correction for year for which Franchise Tax Board is time-barred from assessing additional income taxes. 		Taxation Jun. 20, 2006
Californians for an Open Primary v. Shelley (California Legislature)
Two wholly unrelated constitutional amendments proposed by Legislature must be placed on the ballot so that each can be voted on separately. 		Government Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Khalji
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
U.S. v. Afshari
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Padilla v. Lever
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Brady v. Abbott Laboratories
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Chavis v. Evans
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Alford v. Haner
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Valley Outdoor Inc. v. City of Riverside
District court erred in ruling billboard company lacked standing to assert constitutional claims related to city's refusal to process late permit applications. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 20, 2006
Davis v. Woodford
Where state agreed to treat eight robberies as one conviction, later counting that conviction as eight strikes violates terms of plea agreement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 20, 2006
Carter v. California Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Employer is not liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by client or customer under Fair Employment and Housing Act. 		Employment Law Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Warner
Minor's statement about molestation made to child protective services interviewer is testimonial, but admissible because minor testified about acts revealed in interview. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Thompson
Warrantless entry into residence to identify suspect for possible citizen's arrest violates Fourth Amendment. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 20, 2006
Carter v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Employer is not liable for sexual harassment perpetrated by client or customer under Fair Employment and Housing Act. 		Employment Law Jun. 20, 2006
Marriage of Fellows
Law that limits ability to assert defenses to support obligations applies retroactively. 		Family Law Jun. 20, 2006
Ordlock v. Franchise Tax Board
Taxpayers need not report IRS correction for year for which Franchise Tax Board is time-barred from assessing additional income taxes. 		Taxation Jun. 20, 2006
Estate of Sauressig
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Wells
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Corpuz
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Hudson
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
People v. Cole (Pearle Vision)
Order 		Jun. 20, 2006
Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPherson (Finkelstein)
Proposition is invalid because it usurps Legislature's plenary power to confer additional authority and jurisdiction on Public Utilities Commission. 		Administrative Agencies Jun. 20, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.