For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Opinion of Lockyer
City council members of general law city may redirect value of health insurance benefits to deferred compensation plan. 		Government Jul. 7, 2006
North Carolina v. Speight
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Jordan v. Chertoff
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Forrest v. North Carolina
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Wright v. Minnesota
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Billingslea v. United States
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Warsame v. Minnesota
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Anderson v. Alaska
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Lewis v. North Carolina
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Thomas v. California
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Clark v. Arizona
Due process allows insanity determination based on cognitive capacity and limitation on use of capacity evidence to establish affirmative defense of insanity. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 7, 2006
Henderson v. Perry
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Lee v. Perry
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Garner v. Ashley Furniture Industries
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Washington v. Hall
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
McAdams v. Harvey
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Scurlock-Ferguson v. Durham, NC
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Schriro, Dir., AZ DOC v. Moorman
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
Cavicchi v. Chertoff, Sec. of Homeland Sec.
Order 		Jul. 7, 2006
U.S. v. Casey
Federal criminal forfeiture statute requires imposition of money judgment even in cases of insolvent defendants. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 6, 2006
Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. Inc.
Casino's workplace appearance policy requiring women to wear makeup and style their hair does not constitute Title VII sex discrimination. 		Employment Law Jul. 6, 2006
Jones v. City of Los Angeles
Summary judgment to homeless individuals is granted, where under Eight Amendment, involuntarily sitting, lying and sleeping in public may not be punished. 		Constitutional Law Jul. 6, 2006
Kumar v. Gonzales
Alien demonstrating both past and future persecution on account of imputed political opinion is eligible for asylum. 		Immigration Jul. 3, 2006
People v. McMahon
Custodial interrogation was properly admitted into evidence because suspect's request for attorney was ambiguous. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 3, 2006
Ngo v. Woodford
Prisoner exhausted administrative remedies in internal appeals process before filing civil rights suit against prison. 		Prisoners Rights Jul. 3, 2006
Reyn's Pasta Bella LLC v. Visa USA Inc.
Issue preclusion barred class from relitigating prior court's determination that its price-fixing claims were properly released. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 30, 2006
U.S. v. Simpson
Defendant's prior conviction of attempted sexual abuse of minor is not violent felony and hence defendant is not prohibited firearm possessor. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 30, 2006
Guerrero v. Gates
Where plaintiff never contested arrests or convictions prior to filing lawsuit, his claims of wrongful arrest, malicious prosecution and conspiracy are barred. 		Civil Rights Jun. 30, 2006
People v. Vo
Defendants who acted together to murder gang member and assault deputy were eligible for gang enhancement. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2006
Kansas v. Marsh
Kansas law which directs imposition of death penalty when aggravating and mitigating circumstances are in equipoise is constitutional. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2006
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.