| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S134640
|
People v. Hayes
Order |
|
Jun. 19, 2006 | ||
|
B177632
|
Marriage of David and Martha M.
Family court made clear legal error when it applied 'best interest of child' rule in ordering modification of juvenile court's exit order. |
Family Law |
|
Jun. 19, 2006 | |
|
B154311
|
Soukup v. Stock
Special motion to strike is available to attorney sued for representing party in another lawsuit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | |
|
02-56509
|
Dagher v. Saudi Refining Inc.
Gas station owners may sue oil companies for fixing prices in violation of Sherman Act. |
Antitrust |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | |
|
S124090
|
People v. Garcia
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S124739
|
Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S127086
|
General Motors v. Franchise Tax Board
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S127176
|
People v. Pokovich
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S126715
|
Soukup v. Hafif
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S126864
|
Soukup v. Stock
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S127513
|
S.B. Beach Porperties v. Berti
Voluntary dismissal of alleged SLAPP suit does not deprive trial court of jurisdiction to decide issues of attorney fees and costs. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | |
|
05-1309
|
Alabama v. Adams
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
04-1170
|
Kansas v. Marsh
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-352
|
U.s. v. Gonzalez-Lopez
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-489
|
Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141657
|
Bandt v. Board of Retirement
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141415
|
People v. Carmichael
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-736
|
Woodford, Acting Sec., CA DOV v. Ramirez
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-8895
|
Rutherford v. McDonough, Int., Sec., FL DOC
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-10314
|
Gant v. 24 Hour Fitness
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
05-11108
|
Aguilar v. Quarterman, Dir., TX DCJ
Order |
|
Jun. 18, 2006 | ||
|
04-8990
|
House v. Bell
Capital defendant's federal habeas action may proceed where he casts doubt on guilt sufficient to satisfy 'actual-innocence' exception. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | |
|
05-8794
|
Hill v. McDonough
Prisoner's constitutional challenge to state lethal injection procedure may proceed as action for relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | |
|
S142267
|
Lee on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | ||
|
S142834
|
DFEH v. County of Riverside
Order |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | ||
|
05-128
|
Howard Delivery Service Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Insurance carriers' claims for unpaid workers' compensation premiums owed by employer fall outside priority allowed by Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Section 507(a)(5). |
Bankruptcy |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | |
|
S136486
|
Garcia on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | ||
|
05-200
|
Empire Healthchoice Assurance Inc. v. McVeigh
Health plan administrator seeking reimbursement from beneficiary who recovered damages in state court tort action may not do so in federal court. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | |
|
05-409
|
Kircher v. Putnam Funds Trust
Remand orders pursuant to securities litigation law are not exempted from general rule of nonappealability. |
Securities |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 | |
|
04-1360
|
Hudson v. Michigan
Violation of knock-and-announce rule does not require suppression of all evidence found during search. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 16, 2006 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com