This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Albertsons, Inc. v. S.C. (Wilcox)
Order
Apr. 20, 2006
Microsoft Corp. v. Jakob
Order
Apr. 20, 2006
Williams v. Stewart
Convict's petition for post-conviction relief was properly denied where evidence presented against him was sufficient to support death sentence.
Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 19, 2006
Gordon v. Lewiston Hospital
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
In re Tyrell d. Anderson
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
In re Stanley E. Kornafel
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
Empire Healthchoice Assurance v. McVeigh
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
Jones v. Bock, Warden, et al.
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
Houk v. Lott
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
Hill v. McDonough, Int. Sec., FL Doc
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
U.S. v. NE Dept. of H&HS Fin. & Support
Order
Apr. 17, 2006
U.S. v. Salazar
Order
Apr. 11, 2006
Santos v. People of the Territory of Guam
Court is without jurisdiction to decide appeal because statute under which action had been properly filed was repealed.
Civil Procedure Apr. 11, 2006
Kaua v. Frank
Because public protection finding increased defendant's sentence beyond that authorized by jury's guilty verdict, Sixth Amendment required jury to make finding.
Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2006
U.S. v. Plouffe
Where district court's sentencing approach was reasoned and addressed applicable statutory factors, defendant's sentence is reasonable and will not be disturbed.
Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 11, 2006
Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales
Order
Apr. 11, 2006
Johnson v. American Standard Inc.
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
Grosset v. Wennas (Huang)
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
People v. Giordano
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
California Earth Corps v. State Lands Commission
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
In re Oscar R.
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
Castaneda v. Olsher
Order
Apr. 10, 2006
Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Highlands Insurance Co.
Insured's bankruptcy confirmation hearing was not actual trial on liability triggering excess insurer's indemnification obligations.
Insurance Apr. 10, 2006
California Highway Patrol v. Superior Court (Allende)
CHP is entitled to reimbursement for DUI-related emergency response costs that include investigation and enforcement of DUI laws.
Administrative Agencies Apr. 10, 2006
People v. Mejia-Lenares
Because imperfect self-defense cannot be based on delusion alone, jurors did not have to be instructed to consider evidence of hallucination.
Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 10, 2006
Mammoth Mountain Ski Area v. Graham
Triable issue of fact exist on whether defendant's conduct was so reckless as to be totally outside range of ordinary snowboarding activity.
Torts Apr. 10, 2006
Olaes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.
Court's denial of defendant employer's motion to strike case is proper where defendant's sexual harassment investigation did not constitute public interest.
Civil Procedure Apr. 10, 2006
City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control Board
Water boards failed to comply with California Environmental Quality Act by not preparing environmental impact report or its functional equivalent.
Environmental Law Apr. 10, 2006
City of Rancho Cucamonga v. Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana Region (County of San Bernardino)
City waived its right to challenge adminstrative record by not making objection at or prior to informal hearing.
Administrative Agencies Apr. 10, 2006
Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Account holder's state unfair competition claim against bank was not pre-empted by federal regulation.
Business Law Apr. 10, 2006