| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S141726
|
People v. Green
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S142590
|
Ritschel v. City of Fountain
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S123963
|
In re Martin, M.
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141547
|
Shaputis on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S143339
|
Deering on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141594
|
People v. Fisher
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141631
|
Johnson v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S142064
|
Pnciano v. Republic Indemnity Insurance
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141517
|
People v. Ramos
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S142378
|
Rancho Santa Fe Assn. v. Dolan-King
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S142718
|
Marriage of Ringgold
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
S141264
|
Miller on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
May 18, 2006 | ||
|
m
|
Conservatorship of Christopher A.
Procedural due process requires court to obtain, on the record, proposed conservatee's express consent to content and consequences of conservatorship. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 18, 2006 | |
|
01-O-03470
|
Brockway v. State Bar
In order to protect public, courts and profession, it is recommended that attorney be actually suspended for two years. |
Attorneys |
|
May 17, 2006 | |
|
05-115
|
U.S. v. Nielson
Order |
|
May 16, 2006 | ||
|
05-9833
|
Kroncke v. Arizona
Order |
|
May 16, 2006 | ||
|
05-9181
|
Marshall v. McDonough
Order |
|
May 16, 2006 | ||
|
05-10505
|
In re Boyce
Order |
|
May 16, 2006 | ||
|
S142822
|
Throop on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
May 11, 2006 | ||
|
D046360
|
Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San Diego (Mi Arbolito)
San Diego correctly determined that development of 14-story residential building is exempt from CEQA under urban in-fill development exemption. |
Environmental Law |
|
May 11, 2006 | |
|
04-1477
|
Jones v. Flowers
When mailed notice of tax sale is returned unclaimed, state must take reasonable steps to notify property owner before selling his property. |
Constitutional Law |
|
May 5, 2006 | |
|
04-1495
|
Hartman v. Moore
Plaintiff in retaliatory-prosecution action must plead and prove absence of probable cause for pressing underlying criminal charges. |
Torts |
|
May 5, 2006 | |
|
03-10311
|
U.S. v. Grubbs
Facially defective anticipatory search warrant cannot be cured with affidavit that is not presented to property owner. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 5, 2006 | |
|
05-17136
|
Doe v. United States
Grand jury witness is in contempt and has failed to show government's questions were primary product of unlawful surveillance. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 2, 2006 | |
|
02-56002
|
In re Vickie Lynn Marshall
Probate exception to federal jurisdiction applies to tort claims against the post mortem disposition of trust property. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
03-55166
|
Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Lockyer
Order |
|
May 1, 2006 | ||
|
04-10041
|
U.S. v. Gonzalez Inc.
Evidence used to support issuance of wiretaps failed to meet statutory necessity requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
05-10060
|
U.S. v. Rutledge
Assets of non-profit corporation controlled by indicted party were not subject to forfeiture where assets were not proceeds of alleged fraud. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
06-101
|
Opinion of Lockyer
Hospital district may not enter into additional contracts with affiliated partnerships where spouse of district's director holds limited interests in affiliated partnerships. |
Corporations |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
05-1104
|
Guastella v. Hampton (In re Guastella)
In determining debtor's schedules were not prepared in good faith, bankruptcy court properly looked to state court record. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Apr. 26, 2006 |