This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Bobus v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles
Cough syrup containing alcohol is an alcoholic beverage within the meaning of Vehicle Code Section 23136.
Administrative Agencies Jul. 12, 2005
Conservatorship of McDowell
Decedant's will beneficiary did not qualify as 'care custodian' under Probate Code.
Probate and Trusts Jul. 12, 2005
Byrd v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Velasco-Ortega v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
MI Pork Producers v. Campaign For Family Farms
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Landreneau v. Pelts & Skins
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Florentino v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Miles v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Yarborough v. Maxwell
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
McBroom v. Techneglas Inc.
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Lovell v. Cochran
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Arnold v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Springs v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
Harris v. United States
Order
Jul. 12, 2005
People v. Davie
Order
Jul. 11, 2005
San Remo Hotel LP v. City and County of San Francisco, California
Plaintiffs who lost their takings claim in state court cannot present same claim in federal court.
Constitutional Law Jul. 11, 2005
Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States ex rel. Wilson
Six-year limitation period of False Claims Act does not apply to employee's retaliation claim.
Government Jul. 11, 2005
Mid-Con Freight Systems Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
Federal law imposing single registration system upon trucking companies did not preempt state law charging registration fee.
Constitutional Law Jul. 11, 2005
American Trucking Associations Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
Flat state fee imposed on intrastate trucking activities does not violate dormant Commerce Clause.
Constitutional Law Jul. 11, 2005
Dodd v. U.S.
Defendant's motion to set aside conviction was filed after one-year limitations period expired.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 11, 2005
Medina v. Ashcroft
Government cannot remove permanent resident for possession and use of less than 30 grams of marijuana.
Immigration Jul. 11, 2005
U.S. v. Gordon
District court correctly calculated defendant's restitution obligation based on 'date of loss.'
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 11, 2005
Deloso v. Ashcroft
Asylum-seeker proves that persecution he suffered in the Philippines was, at least in part, on account of his political opinion.
Immigration Jul. 11, 2005
Gomez-Lopez v. Ashcroft
Incarceration in county jail constitutes confinement in penal institution for purposes of removal consideration.
Immigration Jul. 11, 2005
Knievel v. ESPN
Photograph caption calling plaintiff 'pimp' on jocular website is not defamatory as matter of law.
Torts Jul. 11, 2005
U.S. v. Beck
Prior to line-up, eyewitness's recollection may be refreshed through photographs of actual crime.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 11, 2005
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Sentencing judge misapplied guidelines in determining levels of enhancement of defendant's sentence.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 11, 2005
People v. Tewolde
Aggravating factors resulting in upper-term sentence for defendant should have been found true by jury.
Criminal Law and Procedure Jul. 11, 2005
People v. Valasquez
Order
Jul. 11, 2005
Consumer Advocacy Group Inc. v. Kintetsu Enterprises of America
Member organization comprised of individually owned hotels may not be held liable for alleged Proposition 65 violations by members.
Civil Procedure Jul. 10, 2005