This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Shabazz
Defendant's photo in array didn't suggest he was police suspect; individual murdered was intended victim for purpose of street-gang special circumstance.
Criminal Law and Procedure Apr. 4, 2005
Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
People v. Looney
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Needham v. Superior Court (Country Villa Health Center)
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Smith on Habeas Corpus
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Building Industry Assn. v. State Water Resources Control
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Sons v. Superior Court (People)
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Whitfield v. United States
An overt act is not an element in conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 31, 2005
People v. Vasquez
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Fatima V. v. Superior Court (People)
Order
Mar. 31, 2005
Opinion of Lockyer
City council member who sits on board of directors of nonprofit trust may participate in council decision to lease land to donor.
Government Mar. 30, 2005
People v. Washington
Defendants who forced bank manager to move 25 feet to open vault are not guilty of kidnapping for purpose of robbery.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 30, 2005
Muehler v. Mena
Police may handcuff and question occupant of home being searched under warrant though she is not suspected of criminal activity.
Civil Rights Mar. 29, 2005
Brown v. Payton
Appellate court's decision was contrary to limits on federal habeas review imposed by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 29, 2005
City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
City resident who was denied permission to construct radio tower cannot sue under civil rights statute.
Civil Rights Mar. 29, 2005
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Jaurigui)
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
Morgan v. San Joaquin Community Hospital
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
Timmis v. Kaiser Permanente Health
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
Furlong v. Catholic Healthcare
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
Conde v. Conde
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
Cousins on Habeas Corpus
Order
Mar. 25, 2005
In re Daniel G., A Minor.
No substantial evidence supports court's finding that minor was loitering with the intent to publicize a street gang.
Juveniles Mar. 24, 2005
People v. Lewis
Trial court will resentence defendant convicted of assaulting four-month old child.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 24, 2005
People v. Superior Court (Lopez)
Order
Mar. 24, 2005
Briley v. Superior Court (Hermosa Beach Police)
Order
Mar. 24, 2005
Berg v. Darden
Plaintiff's settlement offer satisfied procedural rule by demonstrating its acceptance would result in final disposition.
Civil Procedure Mar. 23, 2005
People v. Mullens
Where court admits propensity evidence of defendant's uncharged sex offense, it must also admit evidence of acquittal for that offense.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 23, 2005
Aloe Vera of America Inc. v. United States
Party that failed to comply with court's directions in drafting protective order is subject to sanctions.
Taxation Mar. 23, 2005
Bruce v. Terhune
Court's instruction to jury on burden of proof must be reviewed in light of the overall charge, not in artificial isolation.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 23, 2005
Juarez v. Ashcroft
Exceptional circumstances exist so that immigration judge should reopen deportation proceeding even where petitioner's reason for absence was unexceptional.
Immigration Mar. 23, 2005