This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Gordon v. United States
Order
Mar. 8, 2005
Mortier v. United States
Order
Mar. 8, 2005
Pidcoke v. United States
Order
Mar. 8, 2005
Warnick v, Yassian (In re Rodeo Canon Development Corp.)
Order
Mar. 8, 2005
Jones v. Dretke, Dir., TX DCJ
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Wang v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Tellez-Boizo v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Bowden v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Chicas-Sanchez v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., et al
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Brooks v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Johnson v. Virginia
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Barraza v. Dretke
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Lewis v. United States
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Duke v. Alabama
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Baez v. Bureau of Immigration
Order
Mar. 7, 2005
Mussey Grade Park v. Pine
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
Conservatorship of C. (Ben)
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Lopez
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Miranda
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Narro
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Pok
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Velez
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
Evans v. Arena Football
Order
Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Rucker
Evidence of prior domestic violence incident was admissible against defendant who shot ex-boyfriend.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 4, 2005
People v. Vo
Sufficient evidence existed to support 'predicate offense' element of defendants' gang enhancements; erroneous jury instructions were harmless error.
Criminal Law and Procedure Mar. 3, 2005
Tenet v. Doe
Former spies cannot claim that government is estopped from denying existence of contract to provide living stipend.
Government Mar. 3, 2005
People v. Santana
Order
Mar. 3, 2005
Doe v. Tenet
Plaintiffs may proceed on constitutional, statutory and estoppel claims so long as claims aren't based on alleged contract between plaintiffs and CIA.
Government Mar. 2, 2005
Harris v. United States
Order
Mar. 1, 2005