| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
04-7533
|
Gordon v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 8, 2005 | ||
|
04-7589
|
Mortier v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 8, 2005 | ||
|
04-8240
|
Pidcoke v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 8, 2005 | ||
|
02-56999
|
Warnick v, Yassian (In re Rodeo Canon Development Corp.)
Order |
|
Mar. 8, 2005 | ||
|
03-7999
|
Jones v. Dretke, Dir., TX DCJ
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-8374
|
Wang v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-8396
|
Tellez-Boizo v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-8402
|
Bowden v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-8429
|
Chicas-Sanchez v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-480
|
MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., et al
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-8433
|
Brooks v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
03-10877
|
Johnson v. Virginia
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
03-11049
|
Barraza v. Dretke
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-975
|
Lewis v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
2831
|
Duke v. Alabama
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
04-7074
|
Baez v. Bureau of Immigration
Order |
|
Mar. 7, 2005 | ||
|
S130093
|
Mussey Grade Park v. Pine
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S126664
|
Conservatorship of C. (Ben)
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S123684
|
People v. Lopez
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S126607
|
People v. Miranda
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S126892
|
People v. Narro
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S127007
|
People v. Pok
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S128081
|
People v. Velez
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
S130160
|
Evans v. Arena Football
Order |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | ||
|
D043159
|
People v. Rucker
Evidence of prior domestic violence incident was admissible against defendant who shot ex-boyfriend. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 4, 2005 | |
|
C034960
|
People v. Vo
Sufficient evidence existed to support 'predicate offense' element of defendants' gang enhancements; erroneous jury instructions were harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 3, 2005 | |
|
03-1395
|
Tenet v. Doe
Former spies cannot claim that government is estopped from denying existence of contract to provide living stipend. |
Government |
|
Mar. 3, 2005 | |
|
S126119
|
People v. Santana
Order |
|
Mar. 3, 2005 | ||
|
01-35419
|
Doe v. Tenet
Plaintiffs may proceed on constitutional, statutory and estoppel claims so long as claims aren't based on alleged contract between plaintiffs and CIA. |
Government |
|
Mar. 2, 2005 | |
|
04-8173
|
Harris v. United States
Order |
|
Mar. 1, 2005 |