For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. DeLouize
Trial court has discretion to reconsider its order granting new trial motion in order to correct an error of law. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 21, 2004
State of California v. Superior Court (Bodde)
State's demurrer was properly denied where plaintiff failed to plead he complied with requirements of Tort Claims Act. 		Civil Procedure May 21, 2004
Perrine on Discipline
Order 		May 20, 2004
People v. Garcia
Order 		May 20, 2004
Donabedian v. Mercury Insurance Co.
May 20, 2004
People v. Weaver
Defendant should be permitted to withdraw guilty plea due to court's excessive involvement in plea negotiation process. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 19, 2004
People v. Osborn
Defendant who dredged under water for minerals is liable for substantially changing river bank. 		Civil Procedure May 19, 2004
In re Steele
Under Penal Code Section 1054.9, petitioner is now entitled to discovery of materials not provided at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 19, 2004
U.S. v. Lewis
Trial that commenced over two years after defendant's initial arraignment was in violation of Speedy Trial Act. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 19, 2004
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service
U.S. Forest Service's failure to disclose and analyze opposing scientific viewpoints regarding goshawks violates environmental laws and regulations. 		Environmental Law May 19, 2004
Griffey v. Lindsey
Order 		May 19, 2004
The Company v. U.S.
Private parties are not obligated to assist the FBI in intercepting communications when interference would hinder services provided. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 19, 2004
American Consumer Publishing Association Inc. v. Margosian
Abstention principles are properly invoked only when adjudicating claim for damages would directly interfere with pending state proceeding. 		Civil Procedure May 19, 2004
Johnson v. Reilly
Parole commission wasn't required to hold revocation hearing based on parole violator warrant which subsequently had supplemental charges added to it. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 19, 2004
Gallo v. U.S. District Court for District of Arizona
Court rule requiring attorney to complete pro hac vice application before appearance is constitutional. 		Attorneys May 19, 2004
Morrissey v. Stuteville
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel did not err in imposing sanctions in response to defendant's egregious procedural violations. 		Bankruptcy May 19, 2004
Ileto v. Glock Inc.
Victims of shooting rampage may sue gun manufacturers for negligence and public nuisance. 		Torts May 19, 2004
Murphy v. Schneider National Inc.
Defendant's Rule 12(b)(3) motion was improperly granted because factual allegations were not resolved in plaintiff's favor. 		Civil Procedure May 19, 2004
Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization INcome Protection Plan
Order 		May 19, 2004
Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan
Where benefits plan administrator fails to timely decide employee's appeal, 'deemed denial,' judicial review is de novo. 		Employment Law May 19, 2004

Order 		May 18, 2004
Farrell v. Principi
Plaintiff may proceed with civil action against agency because action seeks de novo review of claim, not enforcement of agency's final order. 		Civil Procedure May 18, 2004
Blitz v. Fluor Enterprises
Order 		May 18, 2004
Slaney v. Ranger Insurance
Order 		May 18, 2004
MacPhee on Discipline
Order 		May 18, 2004
Retana v. TIG Insurance
Order 		May 18, 2004
People v. Brendlin
Order 		May 18, 2004
Gonzalez v. W.C.A.B. (County of San Bernardino)
Order 		May 18, 2004
Alden v. Nelson
Order 		May 18, 2004
People v. Rigby-Fene
Order 		May 18, 2004
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.