| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-35845
|
Doe v. Tandeske
Alaska 's sex offender registration and notification statute does not violate plaintiffs' procedural or substantive due process rights. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-30220
|
U.S. v. Alvarado-Guizar
District court is not required to make factual findings when electing not to impose enhancement for obstruction of justice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
03-55765
|
Rodde v. Bonta
County's plan to close health facility would disproportionately burden disabled and is actionable under ADA. |
Civil Rights |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-57011
|
Elvis Persley Enterprises Inc v. Passport Video
Amended opinion |
|
May 11, 2004 | ||
|
01-35764
|
Childress v. Darby Lumber Inc.
Lumber mill and construction company constituted single employer for purposes of Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act. |
Labor Law |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-30363
|
U.S. v. Delgado
To be convicted for drug possession, defendant did not necessarily need to know such possession constituted violation of law. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-55797
|
Ellison v. Robertson
Author alleging unlawful sharing of his stories online may sue internet provider for copyright infringement. |
Intellectual Property |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-30246
|
U.S. v. Bird
Order |
|
May 11, 2004 | ||
|
01-71405
|
California Dept. of Water Resources v. FERC
Order |
|
May 11, 2004 | ||
|
02-30184
|
U.S. v. Daychild
Sentencing court properly applied horizontal departure based on defendant's criminal history and risk of recidivism. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-35534
|
Western Pioneer Inc. v. International Specialty Inc. (Bowfin M/V)
Shipowner involved in collision was entitled to relief under Limitation of Liability Act. |
Maritime Law |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
01-50461
|
U.S. v. Soriano
Finding that consent to warrantless search was voluntary, despite threats that children could be taken away, is not clear error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 11, 2004 | |
|
02-1541
|
Iowa v. Tovar
Order |
|
May 11, 2004 | ||
|
02-9410
|
Crawford v. Washington
Order |
|
May 10, 2004 | ||
|
02-964
|
Baldwin v. Reese
Order |
|
May 10, 2004 | ||
|
02-458
|
Raymond B. Yates, M.D. v. Henton
Order |
|
May 10, 2004 | ||
|
03-30101
|
U.S. v. Johnson
Methamphetamine removed from package for controlled delivery is relevant for determining defendant's base offense level. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2004 | |
|
03-71366
|
Hemp Industries Assn. v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Appellants successfully challenge two DEA regulations banning sale of items containing trace amounts of THC. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
May 10, 2004 | |
|
04-70578
|
Cooper v. Woodford
Order |
|
May 10, 2004 | ||
|
02-36057
|
Snake River Valley Electric Assn. v. PacifiCorp
Amendment to state law provides immunity to utility company facing antitrust lawsuit. |
Antitrust |
|
May 10, 2004 | |
|
02-17047
|
Krystal Energy Co. v. Navajo Nation
Section 106(a) of Bankruptcy Code abrogates sovereign immunity of Indian tribe. |
Government |
|
May 10, 2004 | |
|
04-70578
|
Order |
|
May 10, 2004 | ||
|
01-35153
|
Reese v. Baldwin
Defendant fairly presented federal claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel to Oregon Supreme Court and satisfies exhaustion requirement. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
May 10, 2004 | |
|
B167032
|
Dial 800 v. Fesbinder
|
|
May 7, 2004 | ||
|
02-30035
|
U.S. v. Phillips
Amended opinion |
|
May 7, 2004 | ||
|
01-35032
|
Farrakhan v. State of Washington
Order |
|
May 7, 2004 | ||
|
02-55028
|
Southern California Painters & Allied Trade District Council No. 36 v. Best Interiors Inc.
Union presented triable issues of fact as to whether employer assented to collective bargaining agreement. |
Labor Law |
|
May 7, 2004 | |
|
02-56781
|
Kougasian v. TMSL Inc.
Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar subject matter jurisdiction when federal plaintiff alleges cause of action for extrinsic fraud against state court. |
Civil Procedure |
|
May 7, 2004 | |
|
01-99018
|
Belmontes v. Woodford
Order |
|
May 7, 2004 | ||
|
99-50041
|
U.S. v. Hovsepian
Court erroneously concluded that defendants are eligible for naturalization despite their criminal past. |
Immigration |
|
May 7, 2004 |
