| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S101833
|
Balser v. Wells Fargo Bank
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S112168
|
People v. Edmonton
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S103793
|
Gehrs v. Planned Parenthood Golden Gate
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S117634
|
M. K. v. Smith
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S106903
|
Krupp v. Lombard Street Equities
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S122846
|
Moore v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S107612
|
Moradi v. Pimentel Private Security
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S122698
|
Alwan v. Superior Court (Medical Board)
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S122777
|
Wells v. Wildish
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
S108862
|
People v. Hayes
Order |
|
Mar. 30, 2004 | ||
|
02-1343
|
Engine Manufacturers Assoc. v. South Coast Air Quality
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
03-574
|
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Richards
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
S121911
|
Arakelian v. Conquest
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
S121712
|
People v. Johnson
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
S121552
|
Martinez v. Combs
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
03-9110
|
Rashid v. USDC ED PA
Order |
|
Mar. 29, 2004 | ||
|
S121845
|
People v. Jake
Order |
|
Mar. 28, 2004 | ||
|
S122742
|
In re Angel A.
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122542
|
Stockton Christian Life Center v. McCarthy
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S119453
|
Liberts on Habeas Corpus
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S123454
|
Jacobson v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122813
|
In re Adam B.
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122707
|
Rickley v. Los Angeles
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122374
|
Quintero v. City of Santa Ana
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122541
|
People v. Medina
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122078
|
People v. Futrell
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S121972
|
Black Diamond Asphalt v. Superior Court (Adames)
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122237
|
Hernandez v. Dept. of Transportation
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
S122026
|
People v. Watson
Order |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 | ||
|
A097117
|
Olmstead v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Direct false response to discovery qualifies as 'misuse of the discovery process' subject to sanctions. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 25, 2004 |
