For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court
Name Category Published
Park v. Shin
Deputy Korean consul does not enjoy immunity from employment lawsuit filed by domestic servant. 		Government Dec. 25, 2002
Markus v. Gschwend (In re Markus)
Bankruptcy court's dismissal of creditor's adversary complaint was proper because complaint didn't relate back to creditor's earlier motion objecting to discharge. 		Bankruptcy Dec. 25, 2002
People v. Cervantes
Dec. 24, 2002
Miguel v. Country Funding Corp.
Amended opinion 		Dec. 23, 2002
Solomon v. Interior Regional Housing Authority
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act does not create private right of action for unsuccessful job applicant. 		Native American Affairs Dec. 23, 2002
Opinion of the Attorney General
Videotapes made by security cameras on public transit vehicles are retained for one year; retention period may be reduced to 90 days. 		Government Dec. 23, 2002
U.S. v. Hernandez
Denial of suppression motion was proper where detention of express mail package was reasonable. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 23, 2002
Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic Inc.
Because covenant not to compete is contrary to public policy and California action brought first, dispute should be litigated in California. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 20, 2002
FEC v. Beaumont
Order 		Dec. 19, 2002
Wiggins v. Corcoran
Order 		Dec. 19, 2002
People v. Dominguez
Order 		Dec. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Alaimalo
Defendant's attorney did not render ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to challenge police search that was supported by probable cause. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 19, 2002
U.S. v. Carrillo-Lopez
Court properly enhanced defendant's sentence based on existence of prior aggravated felony. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 19, 2002
A.G., a Minor
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Charles T., a Minor
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Rene O., a Minor
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Shah v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Cambridge Integrated Services Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Leisnoi Inc. v. United States
Motion to intervene in quiet title action is moot after government disclaimed interest in land. 		Government Dec. 18, 2002
U.S. v. Reyes
District court may accept or reject plea agreement but cannot modify it. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 18, 2002
Stevens v. Guaranty National Insurance Co. of California
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Pirtle v. Morgan
Defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to request diminished capacity jury instruction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 18, 2002
Los Angeles News Service v. CBS Broadcasting Inc.
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
People v. Ramirez
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Terrell R.)
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
John Y., a Minor
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
Courtney P., a Minor
Order 		Dec. 18, 2002
State Farm Mutual Auto. v. Campbell
Order 		Dec. 17, 2002
Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation of WA
Order 		Dec. 17, 2002
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.