| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
01-5070
|
Bellamy v. Massanari
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-6046 & 01-6166
|
US v. Simpson
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-2037
|
Dawson v. Abraham
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-3171
|
US v. Payan-Carillo
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-2453
|
Rosette Inc. v. U.S.
Nursery owner using property under homestead patent may not use geothermal resources to heat greenhouses without permission of federal government. |
Government |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
01-1154
|
US v. Galarza-Canas
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-4201
|
U.S. v. Caballero
Defendants convicted of defrauding immigrants fail to establish prosecutorial misconduct. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
00-6254
|
Burleson v. Saffle
Court is asked whether defendant may be convicted of multiple counts of using vehicle to facilitate shooting. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
01-6105
|
U.S. v. Farrow
Sentencing guideline amendment did not violate ex post facto clause. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
00-6289
|
Romano v. Gibson
Introducing testimony regarding death sentence prisoner's past sexual abuse of sister at sentencing is not ineffective assistance of counsel. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
C037875
|
In re Se. T.
|
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-2306
|
Ogden v. Bravo
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-7026
|
Sokolosky v. Saffle
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-3269
|
Purkey v. Simmons
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-2167
|
US v. Wilkerson
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-6323
|
Roberts v. Callahan
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-2019
|
New Mexico v. Pojoaque
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-3276
|
Thomas v. (FNU) Carson
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-1466
|
US v. Taylor
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-6062 & 00-6306
|
Gamble, Simmons & Company v. Kerr-McGee Corporation
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-5149
|
US v. Ballew
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-9548
|
Dong v. Ashcroft
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-1055
|
Ahmed v. Warden-FCI Englewood
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-7098
|
Harmon v. Davidson
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-6431
|
US v. Houston
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
01-2154
|
Duran v. New Mexico Department of Labor
Order |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | ||
|
00-35719
|
U.S. V. Schwartz
Under Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 'hypothetical prospect for relief' does not impair the finality of conviction. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
00-30086
|
U.S. v. Pearson
Defendant who improperly supervised asbestos-removal project violated criminal provisions of Clean Air Act. |
Environmental Law |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
H021653
|
Gouskos v. Aptos Village Garage
Auto garage was not acting as debt collector when trying to obtain payment for repairs. |
Business Law |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 | |
|
00-10325
|
U.S. v. Wiseman
Trial produced sufficient evidence that defendants embezzled from company's employee pension benefit plan. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Feb. 1, 2002 |