For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Moore v. Booher
Order 		Dec. 21, 2001
Marchese v. Mt. San Rafael Hospital
Order 		Dec. 21, 2001
U.S. v. Velasco
Order 		Dec. 21, 2001
Moore v. Booher
Order 		Dec. 21, 2001
Morales v. INS
Order 		Dec. 21, 2001
Sedlacek v. Hillis
Non-disabled employee allegedly terminated because of association with disabled spouse has no state tort claim for wrongful discharge. 		Employment Law Dec. 21, 2001
State v. Baldwin
Motorist's refusal to submit to blood draw to test for drugs may be admitted as evidence at trial. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 21, 2001
Strojnik v. General Insurance Co.
Defense and indemnification agreement between insurer and insured is not improper interference with prospective settlement agreement between insured and claimant. 		Torts Dec. 20, 2001
Oregon Mutual Insurance Co. v. Barton
Misrepresentations that were irrelevant and made after insurance claim was already settled do not invalidate settlement. 		Insurance Dec. 20, 2001
State v. Treat
Defendant who lived out of state was not properly served for arraignment date. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2001
State v. Kinard
Photomontage was admissible evidence because there was little likelihood of irreparable misidentification. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2001
Packard v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
Order 		Dec. 20, 2001
Richards v. CH2M Hill Inc.
Disability discrimination that occurred after one-year deadline is actionable if it is sufficiently similar to unlawful conduct within limitations period. 		Employment Law Dec. 20, 2001
People v. Sanchez
Defendant's act of engaging rival gang member in gun battle is proximate cause of innocent bystander's death through doctrine of transferred intent. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Dec. 20, 2001
Baker v. Suthers
Order 		Civil Procedure Dec. 19, 2001
Sharon S. v. Superior Court (Annette F.)
Dec. 19, 2001
In re Christie
Dec. 19, 2001
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California v. Superior Court (Cargill)
Dec. 19, 2001
Katelaris v. County of Orange
Dec. 19, 2001
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. County of Santa Barbara
Dec. 19, 2001
People v. Stanistreet
Dec. 19, 2001
Carter v. Gibson
Opinion 		Dec. 19, 2001
The Delta Western Group v. McCauley
Order 		Dec. 19, 2001
U.S. v. Beltran-Martinez
Order 		Dec. 19, 2001
Apartment Assn. of Greater Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
Dec. 19, 2001
People v. Donaldson
Prosecutor as attorney and witness undermines defendant's due process rights, supporting claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. 		Attorneys Dec. 18, 2001
People ex rel. Dept. of Transportation v. Woodson
Property owners should have received litigation expenses where Caltrans' final offer in eminent domain action was unreasonable. 		Real Property Dec. 18, 2001
Ritzenthaler v. Fireside Thrift Co.
Because Section 998 compromise agreement doesn't encompass plaintiffs' claim for attorney fees, court doesn't err in awarding fees to plaintiffs. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 18, 2001
Ingham v. Luxor Cab Co.
Taxi may have wrongfully ejected physically unstable passenger by refusing to take her to destination. 		Torts Dec. 18, 2001
Mizel v. City of Santa Monica
Evidentiary ruling, denying undisclosed expert to testify, and additional instruction to jury after initial inconsistent verdicts do not warrant reversal. 		Civil Procedure Dec. 18, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.