Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
D032205
|
People v. Cox
Mere lapse in memory is not a defense to the crime of failing to register as a sex offender. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | |
S098233
|
Alford v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
99-17372
|
Forbes v. Napolitano
Amended opinion |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
S098656
|
Resendiz v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
S088829
|
Allen v. Suly-Miller Contracting Co.
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
S095327
|
People v. Harness (In re Harness)
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
S090527
|
People v. Lee
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
S083297
|
People v. Kemp
Order |
|
Aug. 10, 2001 | ||
A090876
|
People v. Ramirez
|
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
B144240
|
People v. Thomas
|
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
99-35555
|
Edlund v. Massanari
Amended opinion |
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
D036738
|
Resendiz v. Superior Court of San Diego County
Proposition 21 violates separation of powers because it gives prosecutors authority to choose between two legislatively-authorized sentencing schemes available to courts. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | |
B134398
|
Reese v. Allstate Insurance Co.
|
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
S086738
|
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
|
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
S097429
|
People v. Hill
Order |
|
Aug. 9, 2001 | ||
00-5238
|
U.S. v. Poole
Order |
|
Aug. 8, 2001 | ||
A079863
|
Merrill v. Navegar Inc.
There are triable issues of fact as to whether a gun manufacturer breached its duty of care to victims of a shooting. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Aug. 8, 2001 | |
00-0440
|
The Alberta Securities Commission v. Ryckman
Arizona resident convicted of fraudulent securities practices in Canada was required to pay costs of judgment issued as final in Canada. |
Securities |
|
Aug. 8, 2001 | |
99-PM-10316
|
In re Taggart
Attorney's failure to make restitution as condition of probation warrants increased period of suspension. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 8, 2001 | |
00-V-14393
|
Terrones v. State Bar
Suspended attorney presented evidence sufficient to demonstrate rehabilitation and present fitness to practice. |
Attorneys |
|
Aug. 8, 2001 | |
01-1056
|
Gatewood v. CCIA
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
01-1152
|
Curtis v. Translogic Corporation
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
F030494
|
People v. Sandoval
No contest plea can be set aside if counsel merely repeats formal advisement regarding immigration consequences and there's prejudice. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | |
00-1250
|
Edmond v. Athlete's Foot Group
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
S097459
|
People v. Porter
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | |
00-1474
|
Robinson v. City and County of Denver
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
00-8075
|
Bartlett v. Cohen
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
00-1478
|
Haulman v. Jefferson County Sheriff Office
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
00-3280
|
U.S. v. Battle
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 | ||
01-4000
|
U.S. v. Ojeda-Sierra
Order |
|
Aug. 7, 2001 |