| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99CA1795
|
Waskel v. Guaranty National Corp.
Employees are entitled to mandatory indemnification for attorney fees under terms of corporate documents. |
Business Law |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
00CA0111
|
Lutz v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Injured worker must seek approval of change of physician from insurer before medical benefits will be covered. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA2354
|
McCallum v. Colorado State Board of Parole
Parole board not required to follow requirements of state administrative procedures act. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA0576
|
People v. Richards
Conviction for providing false information to pawnbroker upheld. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA0668
|
People v. Williams
No due process violation where defendant requested jury instruction on lesser non-included offenses. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA2181
|
Barnes v. Colorado Department of Revenue
Arresting officer must be physically present at driver license revocation hearing when requested by licensee. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA1582
|
People v. Barnum
Hearsay statement is inadmissible without showing declarant is unavailable. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA2349
|
People v. Boyd
Mandatory parole statute is rationally related to legitimate governmental interest. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99SC587
|
CF&I Steel L.P. v. United Steel Workers
Anti-residential picketing provision of Colorado's Labor Peace Act is unconstitutional. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99SC887
|
Flatiron Linen Inc. v. First American State Bank
Banks may not dishonor their cashier's checks once issued. |
Banking |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
00-7097
|
Matelsky v. Gunn
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-3230
|
U.S. v. Miles
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-6345
|
Ahlden v. Snider
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-24405
|
In re Winkle
Colorado exemption statute doesn't preclude debtor from claiming tools of trade exemption for motor vehicles. |
Bankruptcy |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99-3355
|
Rupp v. Phillips
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-3175
|
U.S. v. McKinney
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-2155
|
Hagood-New Mexico Trust No. 1 v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-5209
|
Randall v. State of Oklahoma
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-8028
|
Mitchell v. Hawpe Contruction, Inc.
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-1522
|
U.S. v. Gill
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
01-10559
|
In re Wise
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-1353
|
Adkins v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 7,
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
00-3384
|
U.S. v. Chavira-Montes
Order |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | ||
|
B144625
|
Thompson v. Superior Court (People)
California law does not require proof of prior three strikes convictions at preliminary hearing. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
99CA0963
|
Wal-Mart Stores v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Request for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law must be received within 15 days of the summary order's date. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Jul. 31, 2001 | |
|
00CA0463
|
Estate of Moring
Reasonable attorney fees may be paid out of trusts created for Medicaid purposes. |
Probate and Trusts |
|
Jul. 30, 2001 | |
|
00CA0731
|
De La Rosa v. Western Funding, Inc.
Assignee of consumer credit sale is entitled to charge 21% interest under Uniform Consumer Credit Code. |
Business Law |
|
Jul. 30, 2001 | |
|
98CA1517
|
People v. Gay
Statements of defendant must be voluntary to be used even for impeachment purposes. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jul. 30, 2001 | |
|
00SA154
|
Davidson v. The Committee for Gail Schoettler
Case concerning violation of former Fair Campaign Act is moot because Act is no longer in force. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Jul. 30, 2001 | |
|
E025810
|
Montenegro v. Diaz
When child custody previously decided is up for reconsideration, courts must use a 'changed circumstances' analysis to modify custody. |
Family Law |
|
Jul. 30, 2001 |
