For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Ramirez
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Le
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Nixon v. MO Republican Party
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Dodge v. Graville
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Fasano v. Richards-Diaz
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Gum v. Harbor House Restaurant Inc.
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Chhun
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Ashcroft v. Lim
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Tran
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Phetsany
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Ourk
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Nguyen
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Russel v. Ashcroft
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Shaw v. City of Sacramento
Amended opinion 		Jun. 29, 2001
INS v. Srimenagsam
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
Fasano v. Phan
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
People v. Gonzalez
Order 		Jun. 29, 2001
People v. Benitez
Terrorist threat may be treated as crime in certain circumstances and is not violation of free speech rights. 		Constitutional Law Jun. 29, 2001
Calderon v. Superior Court (People)
Multiple defendants charged with crimes arising from separate, unrelated incidents should not be tried together if it would result in unfair prejudice. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
Del Cerro Mobile Estates v. Proffer
Where one party voluntarily dismisses lawsuit prior to trial, other party is entitled to attorney fees on noncontract claims. 		Attorneys Jun. 29, 2001
Ordorica v. WCAB
Worker who is injured on the job but refuses care by employer's doctor violates employer's right to control medical treatment. 		Workers' Compensation Jun. 29, 2001
Stewart v. Colonial Western Agency Inc.
Court didn't err in imposing sanctions against attorney who advised client to refuse to answer questions that could lead to admissible evidence. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
Piscitelli v. Friedenberg
Attorney who negligently represented client in lawsuit is not liable for punitive damages that may have been recovered in lawsuit. 		Attorneys Jun. 29, 2001
In re Cluff
Court abuses discretion in denying defendant's motion to strike one or more of his priors. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
Marriage of Cochran
When husband provides sufficient evidence tracing his separate property used for home loan consideration and school fees he is entitled to reimbursement. 		Family Law Jun. 29, 2001
Punsly v. Ho
Court ordered visitation with paternal grandparents infringes upon mother's fundamental parenting rights. 		Family Law Jun. 29, 2001
Cappiello Hoffmann & Katz v. Boyle
Law firm that does not register with State Bar engages in unauthorized practice of law and its contracts with clients are void. 		Attorneys Jun. 29, 2001
San Diego Trolley Inc. v. Superior Court (Kinder)
Patient's disclosure of psychiatric treatment does not waive psychotherapist-patient privilege. 		Torts Jun. 29, 2001
Basich v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Court properly applies clear-and-convincing standard to evaluate evidence submitted to rebut opponent's motion for summary adjudication on punitive damages issue. 		Civil Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
People v. Superior Court (Preciado)
State fulfilled due process requirements when it conducted mandatory psychiatric examinations of sexually violent predator before prior commitment expired. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Jun. 29, 2001
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.