| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S080545
|
Viad Corp. v. Superior Court (Lutz)
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S089679
|
People v. Pardo
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S090414
|
Muna v. Superior Court
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S090725
|
People v. Superior Court (Pacific Genesis Group, Inc.)
Re-publication |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S077214
|
People v. Longacre
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S076239
|
Moore v. First Bank of San Luis Obispo
Arbitrators don't exceed their power, even when their decisions erroneously ignore contractually agreed upon terms. |
Contracts |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S077220
|
Oakland Raiders v. National Football League
Arbitration for trademark dilution action isn't available where remedy sought is injunctive relief. |
Contracts |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S082726
|
People v. Mackey
Review granted |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S083209
|
Viad Corp. v. San Francisco County Superior Court
Review granted |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S083427
|
People v. Demetillo
Rehearing granted |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
A075711
|
People v. Barella
Pleading defendant is prejudiced by court's failure to advise regarding three strikes law's parole eligibility limitation. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
B103344
|
Leone v. Division of Medical Quality of the Medical Board of California
Statute allowing appellate court to dispose of discipline appeal by denying physician's petition is unconstitutional. |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S057336
|
Garcetti v. Superior Court (Rasmuson)
Sexually Violent Predators Act isn't unconstitutional as to defendants whose crimes predated the act. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S069522
|
Kasler v. Lungren
Provision allowing judicial add-on to list of guns banned as assault weapons is unconstitutional. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
94-O-12235
|
Rose v. State Bar
Attorney's extensive prior disciplinary record involving serious misconduct and failure to conform ethically warrants disbarment. |
Attorneys |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
B106507
|
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
No class certification in Credit Card Act case absent community of interest and substantial benefit. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
C017769
|
Kasler v. Lungren
Provision allowing judicial add-on to list of guns banned as assault weapons is unconstitutional. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S080201
|
PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler
Review granted |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
C027176
|
Miller v. Superior Court (People)
Unpublished portions of television station's interview with murder suspect must be disclosed. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
A076936
|
Lavelle v. BankAmerica Corp.
National Bank Act doesn't pre-empt state age and sex discrimination claims also actionable under federal law. |
Banking |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
97-56742
|
Los Angeles Alliance for Survival v. City of Los Angeles
Question of whether ordinance regulating solicitation is proper under state constitution is certified for review. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S062813
|
Richmond v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc.
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S068095
|
Landau v. Superior Court (Medical Board of California)
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S065501
|
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
Order denying class certification cannot stand when based upon improper judgment of case's legal merits and erroneous legal assumptions. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S084475
|
Wilson v. Superior Court ( Watson)
Review granted |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S081871
|
Viad Corp. v. Superior Court (Verzuh)
Order |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | ||
|
S062860
|
People v. Allen
For kidnapping, jury can consider nature, character and purpose of asportation and actual measured distance. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Sep. 21, 2000 | |
|
S080174
|
Boysaw v. Superior Court (People)
Review granted |
|
Sep. 20, 2000 | ||
|
S075450
|
People v. Baltazar
Review granted |
|
Sep. 20, 2000 | ||
|
S074296
|
Asmus v. Pacific Bell
Employer may unilaterally terminate policy if time and notice is reasonable and does not interfere with employee benefits. |
Employment Law |
|
Sep. 20, 2000 |