For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Caulk v. Superior Court (Guimbellot)
Safer harbor presumption in Welfare Code relieves counties from providing indigent health care. 		Government Sep. 24, 2000
Associated Builders and Contractors Inc. v. San Francisco Airports Commission (San Mateo County Building and Construction Trades Council)
Project Stability Agreement between agency and labor organization complies with public contracting competitive bid laws. 		Government Sep. 24, 2000
White v. Ultramar Inc.
Discharge of employee for testifying at fellow employee's unemployment benefits hearing violates public policy. 		Employment Law Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Jefferson
Three strikes law is inapposite to defendant with one strike and term for current offense is indeterminate. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Martinez
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
Caulk v. Superior Court (Silva)
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Hedge
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Hudson
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Lasko
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Nguyen
Kidnapping for robbery may be based on substantially increased risk of either physical or psychological harm. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Lawrence
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Redmon
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Perez
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Putney
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Rios
Failure to instruct on 'sudden quarrel/heat of passion' element of voluntary manslaughter is harmless. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Rios
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Murphy
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Morris
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Robles
Felony properly reduced to misdemeanor when insufficient evidence substantiates defendant is active gang member 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Robles
Warrantless search of defendant's garage isn't justified by brother's probation condition. 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Robles
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Salazar
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Tran
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Tufunga
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Zackery
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. San Joaquin County Superior Court (Zamudio)
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
People v. Snyder
Review granted 		Criminal Law and Procedure Sep. 24, 2000
Caulk v. Superior Court (Silva)
General assistance, statutory standard of aid satisfies county's obligation to provide aid recipients with medical care. 		Government Sep. 24, 2000
Caulk v. Superior Court (Guimbellot)
Review granted 		Sep. 24, 2000
Asmus v. Pacific Bell
Whether an employer may unilaterally rescind a unilaterally adopted policy is an open question under California law. 		Employment Law Sep. 24, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.