For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Read Today's Digital Edition
Place Your Legal Notices
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Jarco Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Commission acted pursuant to its authority and did not violate petitioner's constitutional rights. 		Administrative Agencies May 17, 2000
Aisenberg v. Campbell (Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause)
Titles violate constitutional requirement of correctly and fairly expressing initiatives' true intent and meaning. 		Administrative Agencies May 17, 2000
Aisenberg v. Campbell (Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause)
Board's titles clearly and correctly express subject of initiatives. 		Administrative Agencies May 17, 2000
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
Software company violates Section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in exclusionary, anticompetitive and predatory acts to maintain its monopoly. 		Antitrust May 16, 2000
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
Software company violates Section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in exclusionary, anticompetitive and predatory acts to maintain its monopoly. 		Antitrust May 16, 2000
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
Software company violates Section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in exclusionary, anticompetitive and predatory acts to maintain its monopoly. 		Antitrust May 16, 2000
United States v. Microsoft Corp.
Software company violates Section 2 of Sherman Act by engaging in exclusionary, anticompetitive and predatory acts to maintain its monopoly. 		Antitrust May 16, 2000
Arnett v. Ryan
Disability plan which pays more benefits to younger employee than to older employee with equal service time, violates Age Discrimination in Employment Act. 		Employment Law May 16, 2000
Lehman v. MacFarlane
Order 		May 15, 2000
People v. Harper
Amendment to certificate of rehabilitation process does not violate ex post facto clause because it is administrative, not punitive mechanism. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 11, 2000
HO-BO Engineering Inc. v. Chartered Construction Corp.
Order 		May 11, 2000
Midiman v. Farmers Insurance Co.
In copyright infringement case, insured isn't entitled to independent counsel to defend suit, nor entitled to presumption that underlying claims are legitimate. 		Insurance May 11, 2000
People v. Zaragoza
Defendant convicted of killing child is entitled to conduct credits of 15 percent of the days actually served in custody before sentencing. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 11, 2000
People v. Mackey
Order 		May 11, 2000
County of Riverside v. Superior Court (Madrigal)
Review granted 		May 11, 2000
People v. Mackey
In determining validity of defendant's prior conviction, jury can also consider other official documents directly related to prior conviction. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 11, 2000
Erlich v. Menezes
Homeowners are entitled to recover damages from contractor for emotional distress, physical pain, and lost wages. 		Torts May 11, 2000
Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies v. Miles, Wright, Finley, & Zak (In re McColm)
Only district court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from bankruptcy court involving final judgments, orders and decrees and interlocutory orders and decreees. 		Bankruptcy May 10, 2000
Woolward v. JLG Industries Inc.
Court may not exclude amount received by plaintiff from settlement agreement when calculating prejudgment interest. 		Torts May 10, 2000
Forest Guardians v. Wells
Arizona State Land Department properly denies grazing lease application where applicants intend to prevent grazing to promote conservation. 		Government May 10, 2000
Sheree M., a Minor
Juvenile court abuses its discrestion when it places incorrigible juvenile on juvenile intensive probation supervision. 		Juveniles May 10, 2000
City of Tucson v. Tucson Hotel Equity Limited Partnership
Hotel profits from selling interstate long distance telecommunication service to guests, are not taxable under telecommunication services statute in Arizona. 		Taxation May 10, 2000
Martinez v. Pacificorp
Order 		Employment Law May 10, 2000
U.S. v. Rodriguez-Moreno
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 10, 2000
State v. Paleo
Prosecutor's race neutral explanation for peremptory challenge is not enough to disprove discriminatory motive. 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 10, 2000
Hislop v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
Under Arizona law, co-worker and friend of negligently injured person cannot recover for emotional distress suffered from witnessing injury to that person. 		Torts May 10, 2000
U.S. v. Saldana-Duarte
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 10, 2000
Oliver v. State of Oklahoma
Order 		Civil Rights May 10, 2000
U.S. v. Segraves
Order 		Criminal Law and Procedure May 10, 2000
Keil-Koss v. Cigna
Order 		Employment Law May 10, 2000
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.