| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99-6379
|
Thomas v. Boone
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-1472
|
Simmons v. Suthers
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-2138
|
U.S. v. Koruh
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-6169
|
Gee v. Shepherd
Order |
Torts |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-7081
|
Ray v. Apfel
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-6318
|
U.S. v. Laws
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-6208
|
Nolan v. Poppel
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-1085
|
Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.
In employment discrimination suit, failure to seek jury clarification regarding inconsistent verdict forms, requires new trial. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-1347
|
Montez v. McKinna
Failure to make substantial showing of denial of constitutional right in habeas corpus petition, precludes defendant of certificate of appealability. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-5088
|
Ketcher v. City of Tulsa
Order |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-2317
|
U.S. v. Alauria
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-5048
|
O'Dell v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.
Order |
Torts |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-5260
|
Hutchinson v. Pfeil
Plaintiff lacks standing in false advertising suit alleging existence of forged painting where theres no prospect of locating real painting. |
Business Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-5245 and 99-5019
|
Hutchinson v. Pfeil
Court must follow Rule 11 procedure when it imposes any Rule 11 sanction on its own initiative. |
Civil Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-4112
|
U.S. v. Kovach
Statute prohibiting uttering and possessing counterfeit securities is not invalid exercise of congressional authority under the Commerce Clause. |
Constitutional Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-1188
|
U.S. v. Smith
For purposes of three strikes law, clear and convincing evidence is standard by which government is required to establish prior convictions. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-8001 and 99-8002
|
U.S. v. Humphrey
Trial court must adequately investigate into alleged juror comments regarding reputation of accused. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-7095
|
U.S. v. Hines
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-8053
|
Hutton v. Deere & Co.
Order |
Torts |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-2157
|
Brown v. Lytle
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-8108
|
U.S. v. Christiansen
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-4013
|
U.S. v. Gonzales
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-3342
|
U.S. v. Hogan
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-9012
|
Salopek v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Order |
Taxation |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-6355
|
Clanton v. United States
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-7072
|
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United States
Order |
Native American Affairs |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-9521
|
Clanton v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Order |
Administrative Agencies |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
97-6226, 97-6249 and 98-6020
|
Deboard v. Sunshine Mining and Refining Co.
Former employees, promised lifetime insurance benefits, are entitled to the same type and level of benefits provided to current salaried employees. |
Employment Law |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
99-3139
|
Pringle v. United States
Army servicemans claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act is barred where his injuries resulted while he was on-duty. |
Torts |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 | |
|
98-3285 and 98-3320
|
Storts v. Hardee's Food Systems
Order |
Torts |
|
Apr. 18, 2000 |