| Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
S056787
|
People v. Ochoa
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S051089
|
People v. Monterey County Superior Court
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S049470
|
People v. Superior Court (Pipkin)
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S052950
|
People v. Romero
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S052105
|
People v. Murray
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S053907
|
People v. Castiglione
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S053957
|
People v. Comauex
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S062985
|
People v. Roberts
Expert testimony of gang member's willingness to testify falsely for non-gang member is admissible. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
S050984
|
People v. Drew
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S048283
|
People v. Glaster
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S053569
|
People v. Miranda
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S048808
|
People v. Bailey
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S052785
|
People v. Weatherford
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S046414
|
People v. Superior Court (Murray)
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S052179
|
People v. Jones
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
97-122
|
City of Monroe v. U.S.
Attorney general's preclearance of 1968 statewide law encompasses city's adoption of majority voting system. |
Government |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
96-8916
|
Swofford v. Dobucki
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
97-282
|
Faragher v. Boca Raton
Certiorari granted |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
97-288
|
Lewis v. Brunswick Corp.
Certiorari granted |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
97-463
|
Textron Lycoming AVCO Corp. v. Un. Auto., Aerospace
Certiorari granted |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
95-16310
|
Bankruptcy of Bammer
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S064868
|
Polydoros v. Twentieth Century Fox Film
No recovery for filmmaker's use of character resembling plaintiff as a child in purely fictional movie. |
Torts |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
S057158
|
Roghair v. DMV
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S057157
|
Grainger v. Zolin
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
S064030
|
Lim v. Superior Court (People)
Order |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | ||
|
93-517
|
U.S. v. Van Poyck
No extension of period to file challenge to sentence absent showing of extraordinary circumstances. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
96-16981
|
Fazio v. City and County of San Francisco
District attorney's discharge of prosecutor for challenge to superior in election isn't First Amendment violation. |
Employment Law |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
A075264
|
Forrest v. Baeza
Dual representation of corporation and directors is impermissible, but disqualified attorney can represent one party. |
Attorneys |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
C021828
|
Shaw v. The Regents of the University of California
Employer cannot revise patent agreement signed by employee in order to reduce the royalty paid. |
Intellectual Property |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 | |
|
95-56782
|
Vera Cruz v. City of Escondido
Officer's use of trained dog to stop fleeing suspect isn't deadly force under Fourth Amendment. |
Civil Rights |
|
Jun. 10, 1999 |
For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424. To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com