Case # | Name | Category | Court | Judge | Published |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
97-2044
|
Brown v. New Mexico District Court Clerk
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 23, 1998 | |
96SC483
|
Fox v. I-10, Ltd.
Limited partnership agreements may provide for amendment of capital contribution requirement by majority vote. |
Contracts |
|
Mar. 23, 1998 | |
B094170
|
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin v. Tutor-Saliba
Attorney fees provision between contractor and subcontracting employer of injured worker can't be applied to intervenor. |
Workers' Compensation |
|
Mar. 23, 1998 | |
97-2295
|
Clair v. Hodges
Order |
Civil Rights |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-6022
|
United States v. Vega
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-6244
|
United States v. Acklin
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-2080
|
Martinez v. Heyer-Schulte, Inc.
Order |
Civil Procedure |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-2087
|
United States v. Duran
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-2107
|
Garcia v. Thomas
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
97-8050
|
Mapp v. Ferguson
Order |
Prisoners Rights |
|
Mar. 20, 1998 | |
96-2128
|
United States v. Sedillo
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97-1412
|
Sandoval v. Booker
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97-1457
|
Leggett v. Hurley
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97-2148
|
Sacoman v. Williams
Order |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97SA409
|
People v. Paynter
Opinion |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97SA319
|
In the Matter of the Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause, and Summary for 1997-98 #30
Opinion |
Government |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
97SA429
|
People v. Reyes
Opinion |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 18, 1998 | |
96-0429
|
State v. Vasko
In absence of prejudice, conviction in violation of right to speedy trial does not warrant reversal. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
97-0153
|
Estate of Dobert
Actual notice of revocation of named beneficiary in insurance policy is sufficient notice to insurer. |
Insurance |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
97-0194
|
Orth v. Cole
Where fireman's injury occurs during routine inspection, fireman's rule does not bar suit for damages. |
Torts |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
97-0235
|
Garcia v. Farmers Insurance Co.
Pre-selection of underinsured motorist limits by insurance company does not invalidate offer of coverage. |
Insurance |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
97-0010
|
City of Avondale v. Deere Credit
Farm equipment and machinery are not motorized vehicles for purposes of assessing taxes against a business. |
Taxation |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
94-0168
|
State v. Tankersley
Polymerase chain reaction testing can be used for crime scene evidence. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
95-15759
|
In re American Continental Corp./Lincoln Savings & Loan Securities Litigation
Court can transfer case to itself after coordinated/consolidated pretrial proceedings in multidistrict litigation. |
Securities |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
95-99014 and 95-99015
|
Thompson v. Calderon
Ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct requires execution order to be vacated. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 17, 1998 | |
96-4051
|
Copier v. Smith & Wesson Corp.
Denial of certification to Utah Supreme Court on question of gun manufacturer liability is proper. |
Torts |
|
Mar. 16, 1998 | |
97-3002
|
U.S. v. Ailsworth
Court's failure to inquire about meaning of jury' notation on verdict form is harmless error. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 16, 1998 | |
97-3142
|
U.S. v. Lewis
Defendant is subject to prosecution on dismissed charges where firearm conviction is successfully challenged. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 16, 1998 | |
97-8047, 97-8048, 97-8049, and 97-8051
|
U.S. v. McAleer
Setting aside jury's guilty verdict doesn't subject defendants to double jeopardy at retrial. |
Criminal Law and Procedure |
|
Mar. 16, 1998 | |
96-3197
|
Lytle v. City of Haysville
Retaliatory discharge claim for First Amendment Speech requires proof by clear and convincing evidence. |
Labor Law |
|
Mar. 16, 1998 |