This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
People v. Medrano
Appellant failed by choice or inadvertence to exercise his right to make a record of mitigating youth-related evidence, and remand to allow him to make such a showing was not warranted.
Criminal Law and Procedure 4DCA/2 Oct. 8, 2019
Enclarity Inc v. Fulton
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Webster v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Bachiller v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Humbert v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Martin v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Solomon v. U.S.
Order
California Courts of Appeal Oct. 8, 2019
Escourse-Westbrook v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Mendoza v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Herrera v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Rodriguez v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Lin v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Duhart v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Contreras v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Greer v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Gilbert v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Cook v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Hale v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Robinson v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Jackson v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
McCormick v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Parks v. U.S.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Householder v. Philip Randolph Inst.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Chabot v. Philip Randolph Inst.
Order
USSC Oct. 8, 2019
Flynt v. Shimazu
Assuming California Business & Professions Code Sections 19858 and 19858.5 violated Dormant Commerce Clause, plaintiffs demonstrated continuing violation; thus, statute of limitations period begins anew with each new injury.
Civil Procedure 9th Oct. 8, 2019
Amended Opinion: U.S. v. Green
Sentencing court erred by concluding that it could not first hear defendant's allocution before determining whether reduction for acceptance of responsibility was warranted under Sentencing Guidelines.
Criminal Law and Procedure 9th Oct. 8, 2019
Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP v. Lahiji
Reviews posted on an Internet website meet the definition of 'protected activity' under anti-SLAPP law, even if the reviewer denies that she made the review.
Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 Oct. 7, 2019
Crooks v. Housing Authority of the City of L.A.
Providing false information about marital status is a material violation of a family's reporting obligations and is grounds for termination from the federally funded Section 8 program.
Government 2DCA/2 Oct. 7, 2019
County of L.A. v. Civil Service Com. of the County of L.A.
Sheriff's Deputy's failure to report two incidents of abuse of an inmate constituted inexcusable neglect of duties and his subsequent lies harmed the public service, making discharge the proper remedy.
Government 2DCA/1 Oct. 7, 2019
In re J.M.
Court errs when it dismisses petition for lack of sufficient evidence of current risk of harm when reason why such evidence is lacking is because parent absconded with children.
Juveniles 2DCA/5 Oct. 7, 2019