For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Ernst & Young v. Morris
Whether the collective-bargaining provisions of the National Labor Relations Act prohibit the enforcement under the Federal Arbitration Act of an agreement requiring an employee to arbitrate claims against an employer on an individual, rather than collective, basis. 		Jan. 16, 2017
NLRB v. Murphy Oil USA
Whether arbitration agreements with individual employees that bar them from pursuing work-related claims on a collective or class basis in any forum are prohibited as an unfair labor practice under 29 U.S.C. 158(a)(1), because they limit the employees' right under the National Labor Relations Act to engage in "concerted activities" in pursuit of their "mutual aid or protection," 29 U.S.C. 157, and are therefore unenforceable under the saving clause of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. 2. 		Jan. 16, 2017
Nat'l Ass'n of Manufacturers v. Dept. of Defense
whether the Sixth Circuit erred when it held that it has jurisdiction under 33 U.S.C. section 1369(b)(1)(F) to decide petitions to review the waters of the United States rule, even though the rule does not "issu[e] or den[y] any permit" but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. 		Jan. 16, 2017
Maslenjak v. U.S.
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred by holding, in direct conflict with the First, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits, that a naturalized American citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. 		Jan. 16, 2017
Henson v. Santander Consumer USA
Whether a company that regularly attempts to collect debts it purchased after the debts had fallen into default is a "debt collector" subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act? 		Jan. 16, 2017
California Public Employee's Retirement v. ANZ Securities
1. Does the filing of a putative class action serve, under the American Pipe rule, to satisfy the three-year time limitation in Section 13 of the Securities Act with respect to the claims of putative class members? (Question granted in IndyMac ) 		Jan. 16, 2017
Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Whether an MSPB decision disposing of a "mixed" case on jurisdictional grounds is subject to judicial review in district court or in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 		Jan. 16, 2017
BNSF Railway v. Tyrrell
Whether a state court may decline to follow this Court's decision in Daimler AG u. Bauman, which held that the Due Process Clause forbids a state court from exercising general personal jurisdiction over a defendant that is not at home in the forum state, in a suit against an American defendant under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. 		Jan. 16, 2017
Kokesh v. SEC
Does the five-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. section 2462 apply to claims for "disgorgement"? 		Jan. 16, 2017
Town of Chester, NY v. Laroe Estates Inc.
Whether intervenors participating in a lawsuit as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) must have Article III standing (as three circuits have held), or whether Article III is satisfied so long as there is a valid case or controversy between the named parties (as seven circuits have held). 		Jan. 16, 2017
McWilliams v. Dunn
When this Court held in Ake that an indigent defendant is entitled to meaningful expert assistance for the "evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense," did it clearly establish that the expert should be independent of the prosecution? 		Jan. 16, 2017
Davila v. Davis
Does the rule established in Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S.Ct. 1309 (2012) and Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S. Ct. 1911, 1921 (2013), that ineffective state habeas counsel can be seen as cause to overcome the procedural default of a substantial ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim, also apply to procedurally defaulted, but substantial, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims? 		Jan. 16, 2017
People v. Gudino
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
In Re Q.H.
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Lecou
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Lout
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Mills
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Ortiz
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Pargas
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Penilla
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Perez
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Roddy
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Salmon
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Scilagyi
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Sulitswalley
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Swann
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Taylor
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Windfield
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
People v. Woodard
Order 		Jan. 12, 2017
Anna M. v. Jeffery E.
Trial court has discretion to not consider regular financial support provided to mother as 'income' in child support case. 		Family Law Jan. 12, 2017
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.