
Shareholder
Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC
San Francisco , CA
Duke Univ SOL; Durham NC
Columns
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
You had me at hello. | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Mar. 5, 2021 |
Can they do that? Sanctions and disciplinary actions against lawyers for frivolous litigation | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Dec. 31, 2020 |
The future of advance conflict waivers in California | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 30, 2020 |
ANALYSIS: Rule 1.7 | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 17, 2018 |
ANALYSIS: Rules 5.1, 5.2 & 5.3 | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 17, 2018 |
Hiring former federal appellate clerks raises special ethical issues | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Jun. 18, 2013 |
Night of the Living Dead, Inc.: indefinite corporate existence and the attorney-client privilege | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | May 21, 2013 |
When non-clients attack | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Nov. 20, 2012 |
Beyond CVs: ensuring your next expert doesn’t get you disqualified | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 16, 2012 |
Pick your side: the split of authority over anti-SLAPP | Civil Litigation | Nov. 9, 2011 |
Beyond inadvertent production: Attorney disqualification and privileged information | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Aug. 31, 2011 |
Verdicts & Settlements
Case Name | Topic | Role | Published |
---|---|---|---|
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al. | Torts | Plaintiff | Dec. 13, 2019 |
Sandisk Corporation v. PNY Technologies Inc. | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Apr. 19, 2014 |
MCLE
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
You had me at hello. | Legal Ethics | Mar. 5, 2021 |
Can they do that? Sanctions and disciplinary actions against lawyers for frivolous litigation | Legal Ethics | Dec. 31, 2020 |
The future of advance conflict waivers in California | Administrative/Regulatory | Oct. 30, 2020 |
ANALYSIS: Rule 1.7 | Legal Ethics | Oct. 17, 2018 |
ANALYSIS: Rules 5.1, 5.2 & 5.3 | Legal Ethics | Oct. 17, 2018 |
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
You had me at hello. | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Mar. 5, 2021 |
Can they do that? Sanctions and disciplinary actions against lawyers for frivolous litigation | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Dec. 31, 2020 |
The future of advance conflict waivers in California | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 30, 2020 |
ANALYSIS: Rule 1.7 | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 17, 2018 |
ANALYSIS: Rules 5.1, 5.2 & 5.3 | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 17, 2018 |
Hiring former federal appellate clerks raises special ethical issues | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Jun. 18, 2013 |
Night of the Living Dead, Inc.: indefinite corporate existence and the attorney-client privilege | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | May 21, 2013 |
When non-clients attack | Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Nov. 20, 2012 |
Beyond CVs: ensuring your next expert doesn’t get you disqualified | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Oct. 16, 2012 |
Pick your side: the split of authority over anti-SLAPP | Civil Litigation | Nov. 9, 2011 |
Beyond inadvertent production: Attorney disqualification and privileged information | Ethics/Professional Responsibility | Aug. 31, 2011 |
Case Name | Topic | Role | Published |
---|---|---|---|
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc., et al. v. Center for Medical Progress, et al. | Torts | Plaintiff | Dec. 13, 2019 |
Sandisk Corporation v. PNY Technologies Inc. | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Apr. 19, 2014 |
Title | Category | Published |
---|---|---|
You had me at hello. | Legal Ethics | Mar. 5, 2021 |
Can they do that? Sanctions and disciplinary actions against lawyers for frivolous litigation | Legal Ethics | Dec. 31, 2020 |
The future of advance conflict waivers in California | Administrative/Regulatory | Oct. 30, 2020 |
ANALYSIS: Rule 1.7 | Legal Ethics | Oct. 17, 2018 |
ANALYSIS: Rules 5.1, 5.2 & 5.3 | Legal Ethics | Oct. 17, 2018 |