This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Lance Eliot

See more on Lance Eliot

Chief AI Scientist
Techbrium Inc.





Columns
Technology, Law Practice, Appellate Practice Technology, State Bar & Bar Associations, Law Practice Technology, Criminal Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court, Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Corporate Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice U.S. Supreme Court, Technology, Law Practice, Intellectual Property Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Antitrust & Trade Reg. Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Law Practice
Title Category Published
Lawyers wary of AI are missing the big pictureDec. 27, 2022
Multijurisdictional lawyering in an AI eraNov. 24, 2021
AI aIgorithm and techno-babble momentarily flummox Rittenhouse trialNov. 16, 2021
Crafting AI to detect odiferous law smells when aiming to improve legisprudenceNov. 10, 2021
Wittgenstein rules paradox is crucial for understanding AI and the lawNov. 3, 2021
Using AI to explicate a lawyer’s reputationOct. 26, 2021
Prudently getting up-to-speed about AI and the lawOct. 20, 2021
Gluing together a benchmark for AI natural language legal understandingOct. 12, 2021
Legal engineers spurring the use of high-tech and AI in the lawOct. 7, 2021
Practice of law becoming nimbly liquescent via high-tech and AISep. 29, 2021
Legal word-splitting and artificial intelligenceSep. 22, 2021
Shadow docket spurs lurking qualms about AI and the lawSep. 16, 2021
Using AI for legal reconnaissanceSep. 9, 2021
Experimental jurisprudence to be enriched via AISep. 2, 2021
It might be turtles all the way down for AI and the lawAug. 17, 2021
Attorney duty to inform clients about AI use in their practiceAug. 11, 2021
When AI is the criminalAug. 3, 2021
Neuro-symbolic hybrid AI aims to boost the law professionJul. 28, 2021
Fabled paperclip maximizer saga elicits AI and law lessonsJul. 21, 2021
Adapting our laws to rein in AI before things get woefully out of handJul. 15, 2021
A quick and handy primer on AI and the lawJul. 8, 2021
Ascertaining if the ambitious no-code trend stacks up for lawyersJun. 30, 2021
Standards are profoundly needed for LegalTech and AI to liftoffJun. 22, 2021
Overzealous AI legal reasoningJun. 16, 2021
Stockpiling of AI-generated legal postures creates an ethical dilemmaJun. 9, 2021
An amazing treasure trove of soft law about AIJun. 3, 2021
Canons of contradiction reveal complexities for AI and the lawMay 26, 2021
'Bring your own legal algorithm' arising due to AIMay 19, 2021
Garnering C-suite buy-in for LegalTech via tantalizing AIMay 12, 2021
Bad artificial intelligence will be a lawyering goldmineMay 6, 2021
The skinny on computable contracts and AIApr. 28, 2021
The rise of the legal APIApr. 21, 2021
How the British Nationality Act unexpectedly spurred AI and the lawApr. 16, 2021
Explaining AI explainability amid a legally explainable vantage pointApr. 9, 2021
Apologetic AI might be heading toward big legal troublesApr. 2, 2021
Shaking up the legal ecosystem by introducing artificial intelligence Mar. 25, 2021
Thinking fast and thinking slow about the law and AIMar. 18, 2021
Straight talk on the law as codeMar. 10, 2021
Devising maps that are analogous to Google Maps, but for the lawMar. 5, 2021
Qualms about the deskilling of lawyers due to AI and the lawFeb. 25, 2021
Legal advice by the hour— or by the nanosecondFeb. 19, 2021
Using AI and chess-playing for thinking incisively about the law Feb. 12, 2021
Lawyers as codersFeb. 4, 2021
Personal digital identity as legal artifact and the role of AI Jan. 28, 2021
Confining AI-based autonomous judges to the lower courtsJan. 22, 2021
Legal personhood at the outskirts of spontaneous AIJan. 15, 2021
BigLaw might get boxed into providing AI-powered legal services Jan. 7, 2021
Amping antitrust vigilance via artificial intelligenceDec. 29, 2020
Using AI to make a smartish digital twin of the ConstitutionDec. 22, 2020
Head-scratching about AI-based adjudication being ruefully dispassionateDec. 17, 2020
Getting AI to learn legal doctrinesDec. 10, 2020
Dissecting a legally opined definition of artificial intelligenceDec. 2, 2020
Considering whether AI will simplify or complicate the law Nov. 24, 2020
Legal sentiment analysis, opinion mining and AINov. 18, 2020
Importance of the Turing Test for AI and the lawNov. 12, 2020
Artificial intelligence may spur a need for more lawyersNov. 6, 2020
Infusing the dualism of both law and morality into AIOct. 30, 2020
Pure logic alone is insufficient on the path toward AI and the lawOct. 22, 2020
Artificial Intelligence might spur a three-tiered practice of lawOct. 16, 2020
Legal judgment predictions are being boosted by artificial intelligenceOct. 8, 2020
Artificial intelligence aiming to shape the next era of the lawOct. 2, 2020
Legal argumentation and artificial intelligenceSep. 25, 2020
Legal micro-directives and AI: the future of the law?Sep. 17, 2020
Autonomous levels of artificial intelligence as applied to the lawSep. 11, 2020
Will artificial intelligence spawn a 'Legal Singularity'?Sep. 2, 2020
Bolstering principles of justice with online lawyering, AIAug. 28, 2020
Latest AI tool provides boon and bust for law practiceAug. 20, 2020
Clamor for open access to court records bolstered by AI advancesAug. 14, 2020
‘Legal desert’ report fuels support for embracing remote lawyering and AIAug. 7, 2020
A reengineered path for what the legal system must becomeJul. 29, 2020
Let’s be real about robo-lawyer lingo and right size those AI LegalTech catchphrases Jul. 21, 2020
Technology, Law Practice, Appellate Practice Technology, State Bar & Bar Associations, Law Practice Technology, Criminal Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals U.S. Supreme Court, Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Corporate Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice U.S. Supreme Court, Technology, Law Practice, Intellectual Property Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice, Antitrust & Trade Reg. Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Law Practice Technology, Law Practice Law Practice
Title Category Published
Lawyers wary of AI are missing the big pictureDec. 27, 2022
Multijurisdictional lawyering in an AI eraNov. 24, 2021
AI aIgorithm and techno-babble momentarily flummox Rittenhouse trialNov. 16, 2021
Crafting AI to detect odiferous law smells when aiming to improve legisprudenceNov. 10, 2021
Wittgenstein rules paradox is crucial for understanding AI and the lawNov. 3, 2021
Using AI to explicate a lawyer’s reputationOct. 26, 2021
Prudently getting up-to-speed about AI and the lawOct. 20, 2021
Gluing together a benchmark for AI natural language legal understandingOct. 12, 2021
Legal engineers spurring the use of high-tech and AI in the lawOct. 7, 2021
Practice of law becoming nimbly liquescent via high-tech and AISep. 29, 2021
Legal word-splitting and artificial intelligenceSep. 22, 2021
Shadow docket spurs lurking qualms about AI and the lawSep. 16, 2021
Using AI for legal reconnaissanceSep. 9, 2021
Experimental jurisprudence to be enriched via AISep. 2, 2021
It might be turtles all the way down for AI and the lawAug. 17, 2021
Attorney duty to inform clients about AI use in their practiceAug. 11, 2021
When AI is the criminalAug. 3, 2021
Neuro-symbolic hybrid AI aims to boost the law professionJul. 28, 2021
Fabled paperclip maximizer saga elicits AI and law lessonsJul. 21, 2021
Adapting our laws to rein in AI before things get woefully out of handJul. 15, 2021
A quick and handy primer on AI and the lawJul. 8, 2021
Ascertaining if the ambitious no-code trend stacks up for lawyersJun. 30, 2021
Standards are profoundly needed for LegalTech and AI to liftoffJun. 22, 2021
Overzealous AI legal reasoningJun. 16, 2021
Stockpiling of AI-generated legal postures creates an ethical dilemmaJun. 9, 2021
An amazing treasure trove of soft law about AIJun. 3, 2021
Canons of contradiction reveal complexities for AI and the lawMay 26, 2021
'Bring your own legal algorithm' arising due to AIMay 19, 2021
Garnering C-suite buy-in for LegalTech via tantalizing AIMay 12, 2021
Bad artificial intelligence will be a lawyering goldmineMay 6, 2021
The skinny on computable contracts and AIApr. 28, 2021
The rise of the legal APIApr. 21, 2021
How the British Nationality Act unexpectedly spurred AI and the lawApr. 16, 2021
Explaining AI explainability amid a legally explainable vantage pointApr. 9, 2021
Apologetic AI might be heading toward big legal troublesApr. 2, 2021
Shaking up the legal ecosystem by introducing artificial intelligence Mar. 25, 2021
Thinking fast and thinking slow about the law and AIMar. 18, 2021
Straight talk on the law as codeMar. 10, 2021
Devising maps that are analogous to Google Maps, but for the lawMar. 5, 2021
Qualms about the deskilling of lawyers due to AI and the lawFeb. 25, 2021
Legal advice by the hour— or by the nanosecondFeb. 19, 2021
Using AI and chess-playing for thinking incisively about the law Feb. 12, 2021
Lawyers as codersFeb. 4, 2021
Personal digital identity as legal artifact and the role of AI Jan. 28, 2021
Confining AI-based autonomous judges to the lower courtsJan. 22, 2021
Legal personhood at the outskirts of spontaneous AIJan. 15, 2021
BigLaw might get boxed into providing AI-powered legal services Jan. 7, 2021
Amping antitrust vigilance via artificial intelligenceDec. 29, 2020
Using AI to make a smartish digital twin of the ConstitutionDec. 22, 2020
Head-scratching about AI-based adjudication being ruefully dispassionateDec. 17, 2020
Getting AI to learn legal doctrinesDec. 10, 2020
Dissecting a legally opined definition of artificial intelligenceDec. 2, 2020
Considering whether AI will simplify or complicate the law Nov. 24, 2020
Legal sentiment analysis, opinion mining and AINov. 18, 2020
Importance of the Turing Test for AI and the lawNov. 12, 2020
Artificial intelligence may spur a need for more lawyersNov. 6, 2020
Infusing the dualism of both law and morality into AIOct. 30, 2020
Pure logic alone is insufficient on the path toward AI and the lawOct. 22, 2020
Artificial Intelligence might spur a three-tiered practice of lawOct. 16, 2020
Legal judgment predictions are being boosted by artificial intelligenceOct. 8, 2020
Artificial intelligence aiming to shape the next era of the lawOct. 2, 2020
Legal argumentation and artificial intelligenceSep. 25, 2020
Legal micro-directives and AI: the future of the law?Sep. 17, 2020
Autonomous levels of artificial intelligence as applied to the lawSep. 11, 2020
Will artificial intelligence spawn a 'Legal Singularity'?Sep. 2, 2020
Bolstering principles of justice with online lawyering, AIAug. 28, 2020
Latest AI tool provides boon and bust for law practiceAug. 20, 2020
Clamor for open access to court records bolstered by AI advancesAug. 14, 2020
‘Legal desert’ report fuels support for embracing remote lawyering and AIAug. 7, 2020
A reengineered path for what the legal system must becomeJul. 29, 2020
Let’s be real about robo-lawyer lingo and right size those AI LegalTech catchphrases Jul. 21, 2020