This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Whistleblower Retaliation
Wrongful Termination

Jessica Lee v. Michael Wilkins, Louis Corrigan, Kelly Mazzucco, Kingsford Capital Management LLC, and Does 1-10, inclusive

Published: Jan. 17, 2025 | Result Date: Dec. 11, 2024 | Filing Date: Nov. 17, 2017 |

Case number: CIVMSC18-00816 Verdict –  $1,550,000

Judge

Charles S. Treat

Court

Contra Costa County Superior Court


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jan T. Aune
(The Law Office of Jan T. Aune)


Defendant

Michael A. Laurenson
(Gordon & Rees LLP)

John V. Ricca
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Michael D. Rosen CPA
(economics)

Martin Dirks
(federal securities laws)

Facts

Plaintiff Jessica Lee worked as an analyst at Kingsford Capital Management, LLC ("Kingsford"), a hedge fund that performs short selling of securities. Plaintiff worked at Kingsford from 2009 until November 2015 when she was terminated. She brought various claims against Kingsford and individual defendants related to her employment and termination.

The individual defendants were dismissed prior to trial.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS: Plaintiff claimed was retaliated against and terminated after she reported that she reasonably believed that she was misclassified by defendant Kingsford Capital Management, LLC ("Kingsford") as an independent contractor from 2009 to 2015 in violation of federal law; Kingsford was using soft dollars to pay employees misclassified as independent contractors in violation of Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and Kingsford requested that Plaintiff publish false information about securities and/or publish information about securities under an assumed name in violation of the Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, and the anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws.

Plaintiff also contended that she had been sexually and racially harassed during her employment at Kingsford and discriminated against by not being paid the same as male employees for similar work.

Settlement Discussions

Defendant made a CCP 998 offer of $500,000 prior to trial.

Specials in Evidence

Loe: $700,000 Future Loe: $500,000

Damages

Past emotional distress damages and future emotional distress damages of $350,000.

Result

Jury verdict of $1,550,000 on plaintiff's cause of action for California Labor Code section 1102.5 Whistleblower Retaliation against defendant Kingsford. The jury found for Kingsford on the harassment and discrimination claims. The jury also found for punitive damages in Phase I. The jury awarded $0 for punitive damages in Phase II.

Deliberation

9.5 hours over three days.

Poll

11-1 for Labor Code section 1102.5 whistleblower retaliation; 11-2 for punitive damages Phase I; 10-2 for $0 in punitive damages Phase II.

Length

15 days


#144200

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390