California Supreme Court
Mar. 30, 2001
State Supreme Court Properly Upheld Anti-Slum Ordinance
Arguments against effective anti-poverty programs are often thinly disguised as supposed policy statements. For instance, in "Betraying Valid Ballots: Decision Allows Communities to Contravene Proposition 218, Ignores Voters" by Harold Johnson (Forum, March 8), we see yet another startling example of poorly crafted opposition to the funding of an important and valid government program.
David A. Lash
Managing Counsel for Pro Bono and Public Services O'Melveny & Myers LLP
The opinions expressed here are his own.
Arguments against effective anti-poverty programs are often thinly disguised as supposed policy statements. For instance, in "Betraying Valid Ballots: Decision Allows Communities to Contravene Proposition 218, Ignores Voters" by Harold Johnson (Forum, March 8), we see yet another startling example of ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In