Criminal,
Constitutional Law
Aug. 28, 2012
Crawford update: Part One
A review of Crawford discussing the latest developments on the confrontation of witnesses.
Rancho Cucamonga Courthouse
Elia V. Pirozzi
Assigned Judge
Criminal
Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), held that the admission of a "testimonial" hearsay statement violates the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause unless the declarant is unavailable and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
The objective of this article and accompanying self-study test is to provide readers with a review of the Crawford opinion and to discuss the latest developments in the field of confrontation of witnes...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In