The U.S. Supreme Court has just denied certiorari in Guggenheim v. Goleta, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25981. That's the en banc decision of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals holding that an ostensible "rent control" ordinance that effectively transfers the capitalized market value of mobile home occupancy from landlords to tenants and allows the latter to sell them at uncontrolled prices on the open market, is not a taking of the landlord's property.
There has been mu...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In