This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Family,
Administrative/Regulatory

Jan. 17, 2013

Is sperm donation a risky business in California?

A Kansas man who answered a Craigslist ad soliciting a sperm donor for a lesbian couple has found himself embroiled in a novel legal battle over whether can be held liable for child support. Could it happen here?

Judith Daar

Dean-Elect, Chase College of Law, Northern Kentucky University

A Kansas man who answered a Craigslist ad soliciting a sperm donor for a lesbian couple has found himself embroiled in a novel legal battle. The dispute does not involve the parties squabbling over parental rights to the now 3-year-old girl, as occasionally plagues third-party reproduction scenarios. Instead, the issue is whether William Marotta, a married man and foster parent who gratuitously provided his sperm to the women, can be held liable for child support and other expenses by the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails