I disagree with the position taken by Justice J. Anthony Kline that Michael Nava's bid to unseat Richard Ulmer for judge of the Superior Court is a threat to judicial independence and somehow improper. ("Judicial Election Presents Political Dangers," July 12) There is nothing improper about a highly qualified attorney engaging in an electoral challenge to an incumbent judge of the Superior Court, a right established under the California Constitution. What isn't in the state c...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In